I started this thread, not anyone else, and gave the basic reasons and arguments for flat earth, not as an expert but as one that would represent FE and argue on it's behalf.
:AMR: Why?
Did you do the same for Darwinism?
I post flat earth arguments to see if they can be defeated. Just saying FE arguments are not true does not defeat them. Just saying all globe earth arguments are true does not defeat FE. Just saying FL arguments are stupid does not defeat it.
Luckily, you've been provided with evidence. You're supposed to focus on that and just ignore it when you're called a fruit loop.
A timeless God was defeated by showing the logical fallacies that are used to explain it, by showing the incoherence of it's understanding of free will, and showing a timeless deity cannot create a world.
Evolution is defeated by showing it is not seen in the fossil record. That it's a theory that by correcting itself means it's never subject to falsification making it not a science.
Nope. People don't give up ideas when they are shown scientifically impossible.
We can't convince those who do not want to be convinced.
I could go on but I think you get the point. Flat earth will be defeated when and if the evidence for it can be shown to be false.
Nope.
You're utterly incorrect.
In science, ideas are discarded when they are shown impossible. However, you have shown that you are not following the scientific method. I described it in my previous post.
You think gravity is magic and appeal to God when asked about the physics of a flat Earth.
This means that what you believe is not scientific in nature: It's narrative, or religion, or indoctrination.
So far I have not been persuaded that the photographic evidence for flat earth has been falsified.
That we see the world in perspective has not been falsified which is why we see the sun go down and disappear beyond the horizon.
--Dave
You're trying to speak like you appreciate the scientific method, but you've gotten it wrong again.
You should
not be looking to falsify
evidence; you should be looking to falsify your
idea.
Evidence should be available to both sides. Ie, there is no such thing as "photographic evidence for flat Earth." There is only photographic evidence. It doesn't belong to one side or the other.
You could use the phrase to say that the evidence supports a flat Earth, but that's not what you were doing.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk