(Gal 3: 24-25 KJV) 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Robert's Gospel According to the Apostle Paul
- Thread starter Robert Pate
- Start date
(Gal 3: 24-25 KJV) 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Right Divider
Body part
Indeed, we are not under the schoolmaster.
That's a far cry from the schoolmaster no longer existing (and that only for Christians according the person that started this thread).
Agreed. And?Quite irrelevant, to his/your argument that the law was made void, at the cross, and thus no longer exists.
Paul says, "post cross," that the law "was our schoolmaster." Thus, at the time he was not saved, it existed, serving as his "tutor." How could the law serve as a schoolmaster to Paul, others(Galatians), "post cross," IF IT NO LONGER EXISTED?,
Tell us how you say that you sin, when there is no sin debt to be incurred by you, since, according to you, there is no longer God's holy law in existence, it being destroyed, made void, 2000+ years ago, which defines sin, and thus the resulting sin debt, and penalty.
If the holy, good, spiritual law of God no longer exists, being made void, according to you,and not the bible,what objective standard defines sin/transgression?
Romans 3:31 KJV Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Romans 3:31 KJV Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
of course he was...is why they deferred to prior precedent contained in “his” ordinances and laws...those that survived the alleged nailing at the cross that is...Moses would have approved...oh wait you mean the Holy Spirit was pleased thus in charge...well duh is why they followed prior instruction...I mean it is not like the Holy Spirit to lead CONTRARY prior Law right?
Is why those who claim the Holy Spirit guides them daily we know that person should be closer to His way ans lifestyle and LESS like the world or his former lifestyle before he was SAVED
Yes so hope that answers your own question about him being a believer or there at the synagogue to pick someone up or score some good kosher Nash at potlucks...
Odd Paul considered ANYTHING was expected of proper decorum or protocol as the body of Christ is only under grace alone yes?
So 2+2=4 under a schoolmaster becomes something different when we graduate?
2+2 is now 5 or red or cat or is actually abolished? OR DOESNT APPLY TO EVERYONE CUZ THE CLASS WAS A CHOSEN ELITE
Christendom’s “Law fulfilled = law destroyed” is jewish false witness designed to slander Paul et al
As if FULFILLING the formula destroys the law of addition...
(Lev 19:28 KJV) Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the Lord.
Under the law, getting a tattoo was a sin.
If a Christian gets a tattoo today, is it a sin?
If a non-Christian gets a tattoo is it a sin?
Under the law, getting a tattoo was a sin.
If a Christian gets a tattoo today, is it a sin?
If a non-Christian gets a tattoo is it a sin?
Correct. It is a sin for anyone to get a tattoo.
It wasn't "made void". It was fulfilled by Christ Jesus
Only until heaven and earth passed away:
(Matt 5:18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
HINT: The word "till" appears twice.
Slander Paul?
Here is what Paul said:
(Rom 13:8 KJV) Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Jesus said the same thing Paul said:
(Matt 7:12 KJV) Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
(Matt 7:12 KJV) Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
I have no reason to argue with you, though I believe that you are wrong. If heaven and earth passed away that would not make tattoos legal.
Do you still make animal sacrifices for sin?
How can the law still be in place with no Levitical priesthood, and no temple?
No, you assert it was made void," inoperative",it no longer exists, it is destroyed.
In the same verse you cite, for evidence that it was fulfilled, it says that the Lord Jesus Christ did not destroy either the law, or the prophets, and that he came not to destroy them, but not to desrtoy either one of them, as a unit, but to fulfill them.
You assert "fulfill" means to destroy, make void.
You lied. What is your motivation for lying?
Psalms 111 KJV
7 The works of his hands are verity and judgment;all his commandments are sure.8 They stand fast for ever and ever,and are done in truth and uprightness.
Last edited:
Is the law in place today?
"destroy" and "fulfill" are mutually exclusive.