Nang
TOL Subscriber
The Reformed view of perseverance (as I understand it) views salvation more as a continuous process whereby the enduring to the end proves one's standing in Christ.
Which provokes the accusations that Reformers do not really know if they are elect, until the end. Perseverance becomes the litmus test of salvation, rather than faithful endurance being the promise of God.
So (it seems to me) that the distinction between working for salvation and working because one is saved becomes almost indefinable and could very easily bring about antinomianism just as much as works salvation.
Agreed, and I understand and hear you, but why is perseverance, endurance, or overcoming ever to be referred to as "works" or "proof of salvation?" Whose works are considered to actually reach these conclusions? Mans' or God's? That is the ultimate determination, is it not?
That's why it is vital to have the foundation in which one rests in Christ to provide so that he (or she) can work effectually.
Rest in Christ, is so Christ can work . . . not us busy resting in Him as we work. Right?
It is His work in and through us that I see as those good works. That's why the ones Jesus commends say "When did we...?" etc... They have done the works but they aren't properly their own - thus men glorify God when they see those works.
Yes, and amen. This is how I see it, but my husband I see and grieve a lot about the subtle deviations (stated and fussed about above) in Reformed camps these days ...
Hopefully that clarifies a little...
Thank you, and I hope you will patiently accept my responses in same manner.