Right Divider
Body part
Believe what?All who believe are saved.
Believe what?All who believe are saved.
All who believe are saved.
Beyond that there are things which are not clear to me, even just going by the epistles clearly written by Paul. I believe I am still in a moment of spiritual transformation. Perhaps I have said some things above that are wrong. I pray that God will give me the grace to understand.
The moment you believe you have eternal life.
Titus 1:1 Titus 1:2 Titus 3:7
douge
Those verses dont say that. In fact one must have eternal life already before they can believe the Gospel.
Believe what?
In Christ, and that we cannot save ourselves, as I have been taught, beginning with comments I have seen on this site.
:wave2:
Clueless one, I was point out something about THAT SCRIPTURE that I quoted.
I don't need to quote the entire Bible every time.
Two REFERENCES to the new TESTAMENT in THIRTEEN epistles without a SINGLE clear indication of the body of Christ being in a covenant does NOT support your theory.
No, they are not. You must consider CONTEXT, which you never do.The covenant and testament are the same thing.
The new covenant is between God and Israel... just like the old one.Jesus made a covenant with his blood and body.
Yes, no covenant.When anyone wants to get saved, they must go through the blood and body.
Who was the first member of the body of Christ?That is the body of Christ.
Nope.That is entering the covenant, and it is the new testament.
Anyone who wants to be saved must come to the blood and body and that is the new covenant which is about the new testament.No, they are not. You must consider CONTEXT, which you never do.
The new covenant is between God and Israel... just like the old one.
The scripture is CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS about that .... but you don't care.
Yes, no covenant.
Who was the first member of the body of Christ?
Nope.
:juggle: :dizzy:Anyone who wants to be saved must come to the blood and body and that is the new covenant which is about the new testament.
No, they are not. You must consider CONTEXT, which you never do.
The new covenant is between God and Israel... just like the old one.
The scripture is CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS about that .... but
:juggle: :dizzy:
You said they were identical.... You are SOOOOO confused.
They are identical.
:dizzy:Anyone who wants to be saved must come to the blood and body and that is the new covenant which is about the new testament.
While on earth, Jesus was a minister of the circumcision. He taught the law and the covenants and the prophets.Jesus had to teach the New Testament and then die for the new covenant to go into effect.
:dizzy:
While on earth, Jesus was a minister of the circumcision.
He taught the law and the covenants and the prophets.
It is laughable that you say that grossly wrong thing about Jesus who CAME WITH GRACE.He did NOT preach the gospel of the grace of God that He gave LATER to Paul.
If Jesus was preaching grace during His earthly ministry ... He would have said so.
Indeed and it's NOT identical to the new covenant.It is a testament, like a last will and testament for a man when he dies.
Made up.That testament is also a covenant because that man is God.
Read the scripture for what it actually says instead of forcing your bogus story onto it.A minister of the circumcision is about being a minister to those circumcised and belonged to God by faith. Many circumcised Jews were cut off and could not be saved at that time because God did not accept them according to the New Testament/Covenant.
Rom 15:8-13 KJV Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: (9) And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name. (10) And again he saith, Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people. (11) And again, Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and laud him, all ye people. (12) And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; in him shall the Gentiles trust. (13) Now the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy Ghost.
Classic churchianity.Jesus fulfilled the law and the prophets.
Jesus is God ... Amen.... He's not His own father as you falsely and foolishly claim.That means that everything the prophets taught, and even the prophets names, were all about Jesus.
Joh 17:5 KJV And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
Even after His resurrection, Jesus told the eleven (soon to be restored to twelve) that they should teach the law.Jesus came and taught a new testament/covenant.
Jesus did not preach the old law, old covenant.
Mat 28:20 KJV Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Mat 23:1-3 KJV Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
Indeed and it's NOT identical to the new covenant.
Made up.
Read the scripture for what it actually says instead of forcing your bogus story onto it.
Classic churchianity.
Jesus is God ... Amen.... He's not His own father as you falsely and foolishly claim.
Even after His resurrection, Jesus told the eleven (soon to be restored to twelve) that they should teach the law.
Jesus taught the NEW LAW.One of the ALL THINGS that He had commanded them was to KEEP THE LAW.
Believe the WORD and ditch your fairy tale.
Constant repetition does not make a false statement become true.The new covenant is the new testament is the new covenant.
Are you still in the 6th grade?Why don't you?
:rotfl:Good.
:angrymob:That is derailment from one thing you have wrong to another you have wrong and can't understand either one.
I DID.... you DON'T READ WHAT OTHERS WRITE.Show where Jesus said that; and make sure that is exactly what Jesus said; not what your mind wants it to say.
:juggle:Jesus taught the NEW LAW.
So you want to keep saying Jesus taught the old law? Then Jesus according to you was lying when he said no eye for eye?
Mat 28:20 KJV Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Mat 23:1-3 KJV Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
My four year old grandson makes more sense than you.Why don't you?
Mat 23:1-3 KJV Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.Constant repetition does not make a false statement become true.
Are you still in the 6th grade?
:rotfl:
Churchianity is full of myths... like your silly fairy tale.
:angrymob:
I DID.... you DON'T READ WHAT OTHERS WRITE.
:juggle:
One of the ALL THINGS that He had commanded them was to KEEP THE LAW.
If you don't know what Jesus meant by "sit in Moses' seat", you need to learn.
My four year old grandson makes more sense than you.
Jesus told them to keep the law. It's wasn't about "danger". What foolishness!!!Mat 23:1-3 KJV Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
I've explained this scripture to you MANY times.
Jesus told them since the temple is still standing to not break the temple laws because the Pharisees and teachers of the law would have them killed.
Jesus taught the new law.
Jesus told them to keep the law. It's wasn't about "danger". What foolishness!!!