Ps 68 (Eph 4): why 2P2P does not want you to know the NT use of the OT

[SaulToPaul 2]

You're TOL's Tim LaHaye of doubting the Bible.

It's lazy. He wants to sweep everything into a neat little pile and say "fulfilled in Christ".
This way, he does not have to study the prophets, nor believe them, and he has much more time
to write his bestsellers and read commentaries.

 

[Interplanner]

Do you listen to atheists who tell you the Bible is wrong? If course not.

Same thing with the commentarian.

Paul is the commentary on David and Isaiah.

I guess the 2P2P people here don't realize how many books there are that pound people with 2P2P since the late 1800s because they thought they 'understood' the Bible and that the average believer 'needed' their understanding.

then we have the declaration yesterday by STP that the NT is not to be used to interp the OT. If 2P2Ps were alive in Christ and Paul's time, they would be going with the leaders of Judaism on how to read the OT.

 

[Right Divider]

then we have the declaration yesterday by STP that the NT is not to be used to interp the OT.

Not using the mutilated "interp" like yours.

The new covenant is NOT a complete abandonment of the old and both are between God and Israel. And not your contrived and false "spiritual Israel".

 

[Interplanner]

Not using the mutilated "interp" like yours.

The new covenant is NOT a complete abandonment of the old and both are between God and Israel. And not your contrived and false "spiritual Israel".

Sorry, nothing you've said here is true nor can it be supported. This is always the way cults are: they find one line, and then when you show them all the other ones, they go bonkers in denial and all of sudden their ability to read is affected etc.

Why does God 'need' to have a Davidic monarchy again?

 

[Right Divider]

Sorry, nothing you've said here is true nor can it be supported. This is always the way cults are: they find one line, and then when you show them all the other ones, they go bonkers in denial and all of sudden their ability to read is affected etc.

Why does God 'need' to have a Davidic monarchy again?

You and your silly "need" nonsense.... AGAIN.

If God said it, then He needs to do it. That's how God operates. He's not liar like you.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Paul is the commentary on David and Isaiah.

I guess the 2P2P people here don't realize how many books there are that pound people with 2P2P since the late 1800s because they thought they 'understood' the Bible and that the average believer 'needed' their understanding.

then we have the declaration yesterday by STP that the NT is not to be used to interp the OT. If 2P2Ps were alive in Christ and Paul's time, they would be going with the leaders of Judaism on how to read the OT.

Is a Bible a unit?

 

[Interplanner]

You and your silly "need" nonsense.... AGAIN.

If God said it, then He needs to do it. That's how God operates. He's not liar like you.

What he said lastly on the topic was that he was transferring the promises to the Servant for his sacrifice, Acts 13 on Isaiah 55. But 2P2P thinks it is the last revelation from God on all these things. What would the average Bible reader know?

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

What he said lastly on the topic was that he was transferring the promises to the Servant for his sacrifice, Acts 13 on Isaiah 55.

:chuckle:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

What would the average Bible reader know?

Bible reader vs. Bible believer

 

[Right Divider]

What he said lastly on the topic was that he was transferring the promises to the Servant for his sacrifice, Acts 13 on Isaiah 55. But 2P2P thinks it is the last revelation from God on all these things. What would the average Bible reader know?

Again I see you posting your opinion instead of scripture.

Show the scripture, show the connection.

You simply read YOUR fairy story into it. It's just that simple.

 

[Interplanner]

Again I see you posting your opinion instead of scripture.

Show the scripture, show the connection.

You simply read YOUR fairy story into it. It's just that simple.

Go write a summary of what that passage means, Isaiah on David in Acts 13.

 

[Right Divider]

Go write a summary of what that passage means, Isaiah on David in Acts 13.

YOU are the one that made a claim about it.
YOU are the one that needs to do more than provide YOUR OPINION.

 

[Interplanner]

YOU are the one that made a claim about it.
YOU are the one that needs to do more than provide YOUR OPINION.

It means what it says. Implies that 2P2P is total fraud. Fix that if you can.

 

[Right Divider]

It means what it says. Implies that 2P2P is total fraud. Fix that if you can.

No, you say what you say.

Your lack of an actual response is duly noted.

Show the verses .... show the connection.... you can't, so you won't.

You are the total fraud!

 

[Interplanner]

You're a queer one! How many verses in Acts 13 are there about Isaiah referring to David? Hmmm, a huge problem for RD I think!

 

[Interplanner]

the NT use of Ps 68 is one of the classic studies in how Christ taught the apostles in the 40 days

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

the NT use of Ps 68 is one of the classic studies in how Christ taught the apostles in the 40 days

Quote it, teach us line upon line, and precept upon precept, so that we may "see" as well.
Will you do that?

 

[Danoh]

Quote it, teach us line upon line, and precept upon precept, so that we may "see" as well.
Will you do that?

Can he just post pages from one of his books "about"?

Gotta admit, Norton; IP is "a riot - a real riot..."

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Can he just post pages from one of his books "about"?

Gotta admit, Norton; IP is "a riot - a real riot..."

IP Bible study: 5-6 solid orthodox commentaries, his "the Greek" text, and a cup of tea. Good times.

 

[Right Divider]

You're a queer one! How many verses in Acts 13 are there about Isaiah referring to David? Hmmm, a huge problem for RD I think!

DingleBerry just cannot understand that a lack of reference is NOT A CANCELLATION.

Your entire vain philosophy is based on that WRONG principle.