Jerry,
If a repentant Jew believed Jesus was Messiah and was water baptized, his sins were forgiven and he was saved.
Your false premise is faulty context re apostleship.
Jerry,
Stop lying.
No Jew who heard and believed what He said could be justified by what Paul taught as faith alone.
If keeping the commandments was a requirement for salvation then keeping the commandments must necessarily contribute to that person's salvation. But since all of the Jews who lived under the law sinned by breaking a commandmant then they were guilty of all (Jas.2:10).
Perhaps you can explain how being guilty of all can possibly contribute toanyone's salvation.
Once again you prove that you don't believe the Lord Jesus when He said the following to the Jews who lived under the law:
"It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life" (Jn.6:63).
According to you the Lord Jesus' words by themselves were not sufficient to bring spiritual life to anyone who lived under the law because those who lived under the law had to keep the commandments in addition to believing in order to receive any spiritual blessings.
He was not talking to or about the Body. He was speaking to a special people under a unique Law system for a specific purpose. Not to you.
What do you not understand?
You’re not listening. They’re trying to expound the truth to you.
The Abrahamic Covenant of faith was Unilateral and Unconditional. The Mosaic Covenant of the Law was Bilateral and Conditional. And the Mosiac Law was not merely codification, but was promissory. The “Ten Commandments” weren’t actually commands at all. They were “The Ten Words”, whereby all those who adhered to the Abrahamic Covenant had specific promises.
SpoilerThere was no emphatic used, so Exodus would better read like this is translation:
You’re not going to have any other God’s before me (because I’ve given you the faith).
You’re not going to kill or steal or bear false witness or covet (because I’ve given you the faith).
“Thou shalt not” is not primariy or exclusively a prohibition, but was a promissory statement to all who adhered to the Abrahamic Covenant.
The “keeping” of the Law was by faith, and was more about being kept by God through faith as a sheep are kept safe when bedded down by the briars and thorns the shepherd/s put around them for protection. The Mosaic Law was for protection by promise, not a prescribed course of action to save them by their own works.
The same is true of the Gospel which fulfilled the temporary form of covenant that was the Law. Nothing we have done or can do will save us, now or ever. No keeping of ordinances or actions contribute one thing to our salvation, which is wrought in Christ alone by His finished work on the cross and its imputation and ascription to us and on our behalf.
Faith is a noun that has believing in it, so faith is going to be accompanied by works. But one cannot judge by outer appearances what the source of the works is. The good works could all be sin. There could be corrupt works that don’t represent the saving faith that is in the hearts of Believers. Outer appearances are deceptive, and works of the Law don’t save.
The works of faith will be inevitable, but cannot be determined by constantly assessing outward appearances. The promise of the authentic Gospel is that the righteousness and finished work of Christ is sufficient, and none of our own works can atone for sin (the condition).
Repentance and confession are nouns before they can be verbs as action coming from those sources. If someone has been granted repentance from their sin condition, then no amount of external human judgment of their works is going to matter.
Sin is not sinS. The condition is not the resulting actions from acting as sinning. All who are saved have had their sin atoned. SinS are the residue of the old man, and none of us are going to be rid of all of those actions on this side of glory.
You’re conflating the works of the Law with the works of faith, and the former will never save anyone. Only faith saves, though the guarantee is that the noun of faith will produce works on some scale with the promise that no works of the flesh will remain after final judgment.
You preach a false Gospel and don’t know what Law is as covenant that is fulfilled in Christ.
I find this interesting, but can't figure out why. :idunno:
You are an enemy of the Lord Jesus Christ because you tell anyone who will listen that He was wrong when He told the Jews who lived under the law that those who "believe" and nothing more are saved
It sounds like nonsense to me. All covenants with God are "Conditional"
At the moment you were born-again …
you were only forgiven of the sins you had committed up to that point in time!
It sounds like nonsense to me. All covenants with God are "Conditional"
The covenant He made with Abraham was not. There was no condition he had to meet or continue to meet for it to be valid.
I find this interesting, but can't figure out why. :idunno:
The covenant He made with Abraham was not. There was no condition he had to meet or continue to meet for it to be valid.
The condition is always to not sin against God or reject God.
Fear and obedience before the Cross, and Mercy and Grace after the Cross.
Jesus never told the Jews who lived under the law that those who "believe" and nothing more are saved. Salvation by Faith Alone is a lie. It is an invention of men
As usual you refuse to believe what the Lord Jesus said to the Jews who lived under the law before the Cross:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life" (Jn.6;47).
"It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life" (Jn.6:63).
According to you the Lord's words were not sufficient to bring spiritual life to the Jews who lived under the law because in addition to faith those people had to do works of obedience!
Did producing an offspring out of his own will, instead of waiting upon the promised heir, negate the covenant?