yes on condition...if the OT teaches anything it is that...authority has a standard and is given "ON CONDITION"No, Apostolic tradition=God's tradition.
and make a two category list of "now" and "then" and well things were shall we say "changed"...I mean they claim they were given authority to do so...but even now regrets from the faithful to changes made are rising...
well in a test of honesty you fail because a well placed splinter can still blind...as you said...God being in the details...Yours.
well...depends on your scopeOnly difference is rite, not faith /doctrine, or morals.
CCC claims
1957
Application of the natural law varies greatly; it can demand reflection that takes account of various conditions of life according to places, times, and circumstances. Nevertheless, in the diversity of cultures, the natural law remains as a rule that binds men among themselves and imposes on them, beyond the inevitable differences, common principles.
1958
1958
The natural law is immutable and permanent throughout the variations of history;it subsists under the flux of ideas and customs and supports their progress. The rules that express it remain substantially valid. Even when it is rejected in its very principles, it cannot be destroyed or removed from the heart of man. It always rises again in the life of individuals and societies:
1968
1968
The Law of the Gospel fulfills the commandments of the Law. The Lord's Sermon on the Mount, far from abolishing or devaluing the moral prescriptions of the Old Law, releases their hidden potential and has new demands arise from them:
Indeed it does...the office remains...but Peter clearly warned us of officers in that office that might greatly vary the application of the law within the flux of ideas and customs supporting their progression and from those that arise NEW demands from these Laws.No you don't. He held a real pastorate. That pastorate exists today.
Peter was clear...rather we follow Yah than man's traditions...I think I agree with him...
Happily a standard has been preserved by which we can measure.
lol details right? no problem....man ain't perfect...rather you misread me than well you know...scriptures...lol, I misread you, I thought you wrote "without" not "within".
but it now confuses it even more because if you answered "including me" thinking I wrote "without"
so you are including yourself with those "without" the church renouncing V2?
or including yourself with those in the church "without" renouncing V2
details details...amazing we have the BIBLE at all eh?
thanks for preserving it and giving it to us...finally
with the wrapping on it...unopened...barely read...LOL