Paul did not write Hebrews; we do not know who did

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
See here

If the N.T. were ordered chronologically:

New Testament​

  1. Matthew (around 80-90 AD)
  2. Mark (around 68-70 AD)
  3. Luke (around 80-90 AD)
  4. John (around 90-100 AD)
  5. Acts (around 80-90 AD)
  6. Epistles of James (around 61-70 AD)
  7. Epistles of Peter (around 64-68 AD)
  8. Epistles of Paul (in chronological order):
    • Galatians (around 55 AD)
    • 1 Thessalonians (around 51 AD)
    • 2 Thessalonians (around 51 AD)
    • 1 Corinthians (around 55 AD)
    • 2 Corinthians (around 56 AD)
    • Romans (around 57 AD)
    • Colossians (around 61 AD)
    • Philemon (around 61 AD)
    • Ephesians (around 62 AD)
    • Philippians (around 62 AD)
    • 1 Timothy (around 64 AD)
    • Titus (around 64 AD)
    • 2 Timothy (around 67 AD)
    • Hebrews (around 68-70 AD)
    • Revelation (around 90-100 AD)

I think you misplaced one of your /LIST tags...

I copied pasted and agree

With the source you copied from?

Revelation wasn't written by Paul.

Nor was Hebrews, for that matter.
 

Derf

Well-known member
He will continue to add to it. The Olive Tree is Israel. Don't over think it.
Let's at least think it enough.
So He was not starting a building, but continuing one? One where the foundation was only recently laid, or was about to be laid? Is this a wise way to build, waiting for the foundation until other parts are built? I just can't see how Jesus' statement could be taken for a building that was started 1500 years before, and the foundation still wasn't in place.
 

Nick M

Born that men no longer die
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I don't think so. Because the coincidence is too great.

The books of the Bible are divided for sake of convenience and the logical historical development.

This is what I observe and think. They can be shorter as they go, referring to Paul specifically. Paul doesn't talk about the Olive tree to those in Ephesus. I think I spelled it right. The doctrine given to Paul was revealed gradually. And the gifts of the Holy Spirit vanish with his books. The gifts of the Holy Spirit were for Israel to evangelize the good news of the kingdom. Having gentiles speak in their tongue was still a tool of witness. It was proof to those in Jerusalem. The letter to the Ephesians reveals the unsearchable riches of Christ. That the strangers to the covenants of promise will be holy and blameless in him. Paul might have taught that in person but he didn't include it to the proselytes in Rome, that he was bringing into grace.

15 So I said, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said, ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. 16 But rise and stand on your feet; for I have appeared to you for this purpose, to make you a minister and a witness both of the things which you have seen and of the things which I will yet reveal to you.

Not everything was put in front of him at once. And why would it be. Upon his conversion, he preached that Jesus is the Christ.

It is not a matter of coincidence or just length to put Paul's letter's after Acts and the fall of Israel, and before Hebrews after the departure of the church. After the departure of the church, the law of Moses will come back, blindness to Israel will be lifted. There is no way that it just worked out that way. I also think Paul's letters bear witness to the risen Lord Jesus Christ appearing to him directly, the Holy Spirit guided him as much as he guided Moses in what he was to write.
 

Nick M

Born that men no longer die
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Let's at least think it enough.
So He was not starting a building, but continuing one? One where the foundation was only recently laid, or was about to be laid? Is this a wise way to build, waiting for the foundation until other parts are built? I just can't see how Jesus' statement could be taken for a building that was started 1500 years before, and the foundation still wasn't in place.
Go read the "Old Testament"
 

Right Divider

Body part
See here

If the N.T. were ordered chronologically:

New Testament​

  1. Matthew (around 80-90 AD)
  2. Mark (around 68-70 AD)
  3. Luke (around 80-90 AD)
  4. John (around 90-100 AD)
  5. Acts (around 80-90 AD)
  6. Epistles of James (around 61-70 AD)
  7. Epistles of Peter (around 64-68 AD)
  8. Epistles of Paul (in chronological order):
    • Galatians (around 55 AD)
    • 1 Thessalonians (around 51 AD)
    • 2 Thessalonians (around 51 AD)
    • 1 Corinthians (around 55 AD)
    • 2 Corinthians (around 56 AD)
    • Romans (around 57 AD)
    • Colossians (around 61 AD)
    • Philemon (around 61 AD)
    • Ephesians (around 62 AD)
    • Philippians (around 62 AD)
    • 1 Timothy (around 64 AD)
    • Titus (around 64 AD)
    • 2 Timothy (around 67 AD)
    • Hebrews (around 68-70 AD)
    • Revelation (around 90-100 AD)
Those may be widely accepted dates, but I think that they are mostly late dates.

For example, I highly doubt that Revelation was post '70, as it does not appear that the temple has been destroyed.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Go read the "Old Testament"
I don't think that answers my question. If Jesus is going to be building a church (congregation) starting with a foundation that has something to do with a Rock, the Old Testament doesn't seem to tell me about it very well, except in future terms, because all past terms are not applicable to the thing Jesus is starting to build in His time.
 

Lon

Well-known member
Nope, there is not a mention of the church in the OT......It was the mystery among others..prophecy often spoke of.
I don't think that answers my question. If Jesus is going to be building a church (congregation) starting with a foundation that has something to do with a Rock, the Old Testament doesn't seem to tell me about it very well, except in future terms, because all past terms are not applicable to the thing Jesus is starting to build in His time.
ἐκκλησία Ekklasia
Found in the LXX (Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament)
Leviticus 8.3: assemble (εκκλησιασον) all the gathering (συναγωγην)

Deuteronomy 9.10: the day of the assembly (εκκλησιας)

1 Kings 8.14: the assembly of Israel (εκκλησια ισραηλ)

Job 30.28: I stood and cried out in the assembly (εκκλησια)

Psalm 22.22: In the midst of the assembly (εκκλησιας) I will praise you

It is said,"you'all are the church" (assembly or whole group of us).

If we don't over-spiritualize the word, it simply means all of us and all of us gathered together. The Spiritual comes from the contexts and carries meaning in significance, not the word itself.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Nope, there is not a mention of the church in the OT......
What, exactly, do you mean by "the church"?

Stephen tells us that there was a "church" in the wilderness:

Acts 7:38 (AKJV/PCE)​
(7:38) This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and [with] our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:​

It was the mystery among others..prophecy often spoke of.
You're very hard to follow....

The bottom line is that the church which is His body (i.e., the body of Christ) was nowhere to be found in Acts 1-8.
 

Derf

Well-known member
ἐκκλησία Ekklasia
Found in the LXX (Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament)
Leviticus 8.3: assemble (εκκλησιασον) all the gathering (συναγωγην)

Deuteronomy 9.10: the day of the assembly (εκκλησιας)

1 Kings 8.14: the assembly of Israel (εκκλησια ισραηλ)

Job 30.28: I stood and cried out in the assembly (εκκλησια)

Psalm 22.22: In the midst of the assembly (εκκλησιας) I will praise you

It is said,"you'all are the church" (assembly or whole group of us).

If we don't over-spiritualize the word, it simply means all of us and all of us gathered together. The Spiritual comes from the contexts and carries meaning in significance, not the word itself.
Agreed. And the context of building a church (congregation or group) on a foundation with the word "will", which is a future tense auxiliary verb, means, from context, something that was not already started 1500 years ago, as far as I can tell.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
So it was a new church (group, congregation), right? One that was required to follow those laws you mention below? And another church (group, congregation) was built that did not have to follow those laws. In terms of buildings, then, there was a wall of separation between the two, right?

Now, in terms of building, how many churches are there, since there's no wall separating them?

 

Nick M

Born that men no longer die
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I don't think that answers my question.
The Lord Jesus Christ quoted the "Old Testament" all the time. So it does. The restoration at that point was a future event. It still is. He is building his church.
 

Bladerunner

Active member
ἐκκλησία Ekklasia
Found in the LXX (Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament)
Leviticus 8.3: assemble (εκκλησιασον) all the gathering (συναγωγην)

Deuteronomy 9.10: the day of the assembly (εκκλησιας)

1 Kings 8.14: the assembly of Israel (εκκλησια ισραηλ)

Job 30.28: I stood and cried out in the assembly (εκκλησια)

Psalm 22.22: In the midst of the assembly (εκκλησιας) I will praise you

It is said,"you'all are the church" (assembly or whole group of us).

If we don't over-spiritualize the word, it simply means all of us and all of us gathered together. The Spiritual comes from the contexts and carries meaning in significance, not the word itself.
Ah, but the church that Jesus Built was not part of that OT past...except in prophecy and even then so obscure that nobody knew what it meant...Even today, different theologies argue over the prophecies that God gave us to guide us to the end....We know more about the future that we know about all the days of Jesus Christ on this earth. Assembly of Israel was just that..the assembly of a nation and not the assembly of church members...Also rem, the members of His Church are there in spirit and not bodily until the Rapture happens and it will.
 

Bladerunner

Active member
ἐκκλησία Ekklasia
Found in the LXX (Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament)
Leviticus 8.3: assemble (εκκλησιασον) all the gathering (συναγωγην)

Deuteronomy 9.10: the day of the assembly (εκκλησιας)

1 Kings 8.14: the assembly of Israel (εκκλησια ισραηλ)

Job 30.28: I stood and cried out in the assembly (εκκλησια)

Psalm 22.22: In the midst of the assembly (εκκλησιας) I will praise you

It is said,"you'all are the church" (assembly or whole group of us).

If we don't over-spiritualize the word, it simply means all of us and all of us gathered together. The Spiritual comes from the contexts and carries meaning in significance, not the word itself.
The Church became
What, exactly, do you mean by "the church is the spiritual body of Christ which are those people dead and alive at this time from it beginning
the
Stephen tells us that there was a "church" in the wilderness:

Acts 7:38 (AKJV/PCE)​
(7:38) This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and [with] our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:​


You're very hard to follow....

The bottom line is that the church which is His body (i.e., the body of Christ) was nowhere to be found in Acts 1-8.

What, exactly, do you mean by "the church"?.
This is a church that is not brick and mortar, it consist the spirits of the people both dead and alive who believed in Jesus from beginning in Acts 2. From this time forward, the Holy Spirit resides within the bodies of the believers.. Before, as in the OT up to Acts 2, the Holy Spirit was simply around the vicinity of the person, with the exceptions of some of the major players back then. This the real separation of the Church (NT)and the assembly in the wilderness in the OT.
Stephen tells us that there was a "church" in the wilderness: Acts 7:38 (AKJV/PCE)
(7:38) This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and [with] our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:​
Yes, a very different church...back then a physical church today a spiritual church of believers'
You're very hard to follow....

The bottom line is that the church which is His body (i.e., the body of Christ) was nowhere to be found in Acts 1-8.
the Holy Spirit is the Bodiment of the Church that Jesus Built. He is the restrainer within all believers of this spiritual church. Of course, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are one..

It is nice to have a conversation with you. Have a great evening!
 

Right Divider

Body part
The Church became
Please speak English.
?
This is a church that is not brick and mortar, it consist the spirits of the people both dead and alive who believed in Jesus from beginning in Acts 2.
Once AGAIN, the church which is His body (i.e., the body of Christ) was NOWHERE to be found in Acts 2. The apostle Paul was its first member around the Acts 9 time period.
From this time forward, the Holy Spirit resides within the bodies of the believers..
Act 2 was 100% Jewish.

Acts 2:22 (AKJV/PCE)​
(2:22) Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:​
It is nice to have a conversation with you. Have a great evening!
Thanks... but you are not having a conversation. You are having a monologue with yourself.
 

Lon

Well-known member
Ah, but the church that Jesus Built was not part of that OT past...except in prophecy and even then so obscure that nobody knew what it meant...Even today, different theologies argue over the prophecies that God gave us to guide us to the end....We know more about the future that we know about all the days of Jesus Christ on this earth. Assembly of Israel was just that..the assembly of a nation and not the assembly of church members...Also rem, the members of His Church are there in spirit and not bodily until the Rapture happens and it will.
Thanks... but you are not having a conversation. You are having a monologue with yourself.
RD is telling you, your indoctrination is speaking loudly and ignoring. It tends to be the first thing on TOL. Please read what I said:
It is said,"you'all are the church" (assembly or whole group of us).

If we don't over-spiritualize the word, it simply means all of us and all of us gathered together. The Spiritual comes from the contexts and carries meaning in significance, not the word itself.
It means assembly back then and today. Different assemblies? You are halfway there if you follow.
 

Lon

Well-known member
Agreed. And the context of building a church (congregation or group) on a foundation with the word "will", which is a future tense auxiliary verb, means, from context, something that was not already started 1500 years ago, as far as I can tell.
Try "Assembly" as one meaning of the word. "Church" is the same, though Jews never adopted the term like we have today. See just above: If we overload the term (and we have) we tend to make the word complicated.
 

Bladerunner

Active member
Please speak English.

?

Once AGAIN, the church which is His body (i.e., the body of Christ) was NOWHERE to be found in Acts 2. The apostle Paul was its first member around the Acts 9 time period.

Act 2 was 100% Jewish.

Acts 2:22 (AKJV/PCE)​
(2:22) Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:​

Thanks... but you are not having a conversation. You are having a monologue with yourself.
The Church that Jesus built has all who believe in His Gospel, both Jew and Gentile.....during this dispensational period of the Church.
 
Top