I am not interested in your reply or your excuses. I just did that to inform the public.
good day.
Case in point.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
I am not interested in your reply or your excuses. I just did that to inform the public.
good day.
If there is anyone who doesn't want to hear what her opponent says, it's you, Meshak.
If I didn't really care what you said, I wouldn't address each of your points with lengthy replies.
Meshak, if someone is wrong about a subject, and they don't know it, but strongly defend their side, is it wrong to tell them that they're wrong and why?
God's people should be the ONLY ones making such decisions, (see my thread on what a Christian government would look like here) as we are the only ones who know right from wrong. We are to be salt and light in the world, showing the world the difference between good and evil, telling them to repent of their sins because if they don't, they WILL spend the rest of eternity apart from their Creator who loves them enough to send His son to die for them.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
:listen: people will think you are aJesus followers should not endorse any kind of violent practice such as joining the military.
We see Roman soldiers being baptised and saved.
Paul teaches that the soldier is an institution of God to reward the righteous and to punish the unrighteous.
And the passages don't say what they did AFTERWARD, do they? Perhaps they did not return to their soldiering. Christians in the earliest days of the Christian congregation did not participate in the military, and this is backed up by historical accounts.
Exodus 15:3 KJV The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name.
No, the lowly Galilean fisherman, being the alleged "pacifist," "sweet baby lying in a manger," harmless, would not....
John 2:15 KJV and when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables;.....
....would, He?
Good day to you, sir.
Revelation 19 KJV
15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
Good day to you, sir. You are on ignore/un-ignore.
It seems that he already serving as a soldier so he could not just get out of it.How long do you suppose Cornelius lived after he quit soldiering in the Roman army?
You haven't read the Old Testament. There's plenty of wars going on and God is on the side of the Israelites.
It seems that he already serving as a soldier so he could not just get out of it.
In the US, you have to make a bow to government for certain years when you join the military. You just cannot quit.
True but shouldn't Cornelius have quit, bore his cross and suffered the consequences?
Nope, he does not have to kill even in the military. He could serve God where he was.
Does a country have a right and responsibility to protect itself and its citizens?Those wars were directed by Jehovah, directly from His mouth. Israel didn't always obey what He said, but He would tell them what to do. Are ANY wars today directed by Jehovah? Not on your life.
I agree that he could serve GOD where he was, but he could not refuse a Roman order to use weapons or to kill without answering to Rome. Also, Cornelius was a Centurion, meaning that he had charge over a hundred Roman soldiers. Do you think that he just suddenly stopped ordering his soldiers according to Rome's mandate?
Does a country have a right and responsibility to protect itself and its citizens?
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
here you go again, same kind of lame excuse.
Meshak, either respond to my questions with answers or don't respond at all. This is a forum for discussion, and if you don't want to discuss, then don't discuss, but don't get in the way of other people's discussion.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
Don't make her use her brain. She'll have a meltdown.I agree that he could serve GOD where he was, but he could not refuse a Roman order to use weapons or to kill without answering to Rome. Also, Cornelius was a Centurion, meaning that he had charge over a hundred Roman soldiers. Do you think that he just suddenly stopped ordering his soldiers according to Rome's mandate?
I repeat my questions because NO ONE is answering them, especially you.You don't make a rules. This is my thread. I control what is going on. You have been repeating the same kind of questions over and over. It is pathetic.