He is against English and against every poster herePP, come down to earth. No one can follow you. Too much mental energy has to be put into figuring out whether you are for or against it.
He is against English and against every poster herePP, come down to earth. No one can follow you. Too much mental energy has to be put into figuring out whether you are for or against it.
He is against English and against every poster here
Is all this to contend against the eternal uncreated ontological divinity of Christ as Theanthropos and Messiah? Or is there another point you're bringing out.
(This thread has been dormant for a short period, and I'm not sure where you're jumping into the ebbed flow of the OP.)
This is one the most important things about the Trinity that doesn't get enough mention or emphasis. Nowadays, anybody can interpret this title in whatever way they see fit, "God with us." But how did the Church from the earliest interpret it? That our Lord Jesus Christ is our Maker, in the flesh. There was no alternative, again, from the earliest.
You left off part of my post... It has your answer!
I was answering fzappa13 question…. Now re-read my post with this in mind... :think:
Paul
You left off part of my post... It has your answer!
Paul
Man, this is a long thread and I'm 60 ... I really don't recall having said that. Could you refresh my memory?
There can be no question the Author of creation was God-*Word of Himself (John 1:1,14 KJV). However, according to Paul in speaking of the man Jesus, the Author of our salvation, he wrote: ". . it pleased the Father that in him [Jesus of Nazereth] should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him [again, Jesus of Nazareth], I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven." Colossians 1:19-20 (KJV)
*"Word" of Himself who became flesh, that seperate unity emptied of Divinity that He be made vulnerable to failure as Adam..
Question: Who is God referring to if not a seperate entity who protected/preserved the union with Himself while in mortal flesh, preeminence over all things being His reward? Jesus, the man now Glorified in Whom the complete Godhead is now worshipped.
I'm sorry, but I was responding to a single question from fzappa13. Your response has nothing what so ever to do with that question? :think:
So why are you posting like a child... pounding their chest and claming my mommy says.... what ever your trying to say...
Perhaps you have a question regarding scripture too? :think:
Stop ranting like a spiritual infant and ask a honest question one verse at a time so you can get a understanding of your ignorance that you post! :readthis:
If I can help fzappa13... I'm sure I can help you too, but you need to focus! Your all over the place!
Calm Down my friend!
oly::sherlock:
Paul
Have you changed your position to being Triune recently?There can be no question the Author of creation was God-*Word of Himself (John 1:1,14 KJV). However, according to Paul in speaking of the man Jesus, the Author of our salvation, he wrote: ". . it pleased the Father that in him [Jesus of Nazereth] should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him [again, Jesus of Nazareth], I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven." Colossians 1:19-20 (KJV)
*"Word" of Himself who became flesh, that seperate unity emptied of Divinity that He be made vulnerable to failure as Adam..
Question: Who is God referring to if not a seperate entity who protected/preserved the union with Himself while in mortal flesh, preeminence over all things being His reward? Jesus, the man now Glorified in Whom the complete Godhead is now worshipped.
This bit has to stop. This thread has been moved into ECT. One rule here is discussion rather than banter (which a good much of this is). It can slip through without infraction, but this thread is not about overt contesting of a triune view. If I remember, CR is one-ness. You'd both have to be considered guests in thread. Ask, then ask about counterpoints that don't make sense to you. Ask for explanation, but remember it isn't up for attack any longer in this section, like other threads on TOL. Each of you may have one thread in the religion section against the triune view (again not the ECT section). Other than this specific one, however, your other posts are fine as far as not necessarily supporting, but not detracting from the thread intent. I would ask that it be kept to a minimum out of courtesy. It is supposed to be a supportive and reference thread. -LonI'm sorry, but I was responding to a single question from fzappa13. Your response has nothing what so ever to do with that question? :think:
So why are you posting like a child... pounding their chest and claming my mommy says.... what ever your trying to say...
Perhaps you have a question regarding scripture too? :think:
Stop ranting like a spiritual infant and ask a honest question one verse at a time so you can get a understanding of your ignorance that you post! :readthis:
If I can help fzappa13... I'm sure I can help you too, but you need to focus! Your all over the place!
Calm Down my friend!
oly::sherlock:
Paul
PP, come down to earth. No one can follow you. Too much mental energy has to be put into figuring out whether you are for or against it.
He is against English and against every poster here
He does radiate that.
You left off part of my post... It has your answer!
No, I quoted your entire post. It was a genuine information question. Nevermind. I don't really care.
I was answering fzappa13 question…. Now re-read my post with this in mind... :think:
Paul
John 1:1-3 KJV - John 1:14 KJV -
This bit has to stop. This thread has been moved into ECT. One rule here is discussion rather than banter (which a good much of this is). It can slip through without infraction, but this thread is not about overt contesting of a triune view. If I remember, CR is one-ness. You'd both have to be considered guests in thread. Ask, then ask about counterpoints that don't make sense to you. Ask for explanation, but remember it isn't up for attack any longer in this section, like other threads on TOL. Each of you may have one thread in the religion section against the triune view (again not the ECT section). Other than this specific one, however, your other posts are fine as far as not necessarily supporting, but not detracting from the thread intent. I would ask that it be kept to a minimum out of courtesy. It is supposed to be a supportive and reference thread. -Lon
*"Word" of Himself who became flesh, that seperate unity emptied of Divinity that He be made vulnerable to failure as Adam..
.
The Word never emptied Himself of Divinity.
The man Jesus emptied Himself.
This bit has to stop. This thread has been moved into ECT. One rule here is discussion rather than banter (which a good much of this is). It can slip through without infraction, but this thread is not about overt contesting of a triune view. If I remember, CR is one-ness. You'd both have to be considered guests in thread. Ask, then ask about counterpoints that don't make sense to you. Ask for explanation, but remember it isn't up for attack any longer in this section, like other threads on TOL. Each of you may have one thread in the religion section against the triune view (again not the ECT section). Other than this specific one, however, your other posts are fine as far as not necessarily supporting, but not detracting from the thread intent. I would ask that it be kept to a minimum out of courtesy. It is supposed to be a supportive and reference thread. -Lon