So you're wiling to stand before God and split hairs? Think that will work out well for you?Trust you to get everything utterly wrong.
I called the guy a homo. I don't think anybody is debating that. :idunno:
So you're wiling to stand before God and split hairs? Think that will work out well for you?Trust you to get everything utterly wrong.
I called the guy a homo. I don't think anybody is debating that. :idunno:
You just take him at his word then?
What I am saying is that, over the years I have found Nick to be a reliable source. Do you not have people you trust, just because you trust them?So what you are saying is that though I have seen no evidence against you for any crime, it may exist, and therefore it makes sense to publicly declare you guilty? :think:
For example, many gun owners commit crimes and you are a gun owner....
So you're wiling to stand before God and split hairs? Think that will work out well for you?
What I am saying is that, over the years I have found Nick to be a reliable source.
Do you not have people you trust, just because you trust them?
I think even that gives him too much credit. If he had actual evidence, he would have stated it at the outset. He's just a bigot. Asking him for evidence is like demanding that stones compose a symphony. All you'll get is silence.
I try to ask questions rather than make assumptions as much as possible. Asking a question forces Nick to either respond in some fashion or be silent. Silence in the face of a question speaks more than not presenting what wasn't asked for.
Maybe. But at least I will not stand before God and state as fact that which I have not witnessed.You're a retard.
Maybe. But at least I will not stand before God and state as fact that which I have not witnessed.
I try to ask questions rather than make assumptions as much as possible. Asking a question forces Nick to either respond in some fashion or be silent. Silence in the face of a question speaks more than not presenting what wasn't asked for.
No. You're not a retard. You're a man with integrity, and you're right on this.
Nick made an unsubstantiated accusation of criminal behavior of the worst kind about someone without any proof, and Delmar is going to blindly believe it because... Nick said it? It's sickening, but not surprising.
Secretary, Flight Attendant and Nurse are three occupations where I assume that if a guy is working them then he's gay.
Silence in the face of a question speaks more than not presenting what wasn't asked for.
mark 14:60 And the high priest stood up in the midst, and asked Jesus, saying, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee? 61 But he held his peace, and answered nothing. |
mark 14:60 And the high priest stood up in the midst, and asked Jesus, saying, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
61 But he held his peace, and answered nothing.
Sure, Jesus chose to remain silent. That's not what's happening here.
and you know this because....?
Sure, Jesus chose to remain silent.
Obama did in fact nominate a homo for Secretary of the Army.What I am saying is that, over the years I have found Nick to be a reliable source. Do you not have people you trust, just because you trust them?
Wait, were you putting Nick in the place of Jesus?