Obama nominates child molesting homo for Secretary of the Army

[Stripe]

It's not OK to be a homo.

 

[ok doser]

What's going on?
What's Secretary of the Army?

I think he's the guy who gets the coffee at meetings

 

[shagster01]

That's because the oldest trick in the book is that most gays are pedophiles, they like little boys.

They like little boys and Donald Trump. . .

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/19/politics/trump-delegate-child-porn-gun-explosives/index.html

 

[rexlunae]

If you have not seen it. It does not exist. I get it.

Are you suggesting that you have seen it? You, Delmar have actual evidence that the President's nominee is a pedophile?

No, I don't buy it.

 

[intojoy]

Are you suggesting that you have seen it? You, Delmar have actual evidence that the President's nominee is a pedophile?

No, I don't buy it.

Trust me


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

 

[Delmar]

Are you suggesting that you have seen it?

I'm not the one calling Nick a liar.

 

[rexlunae]

I'm not the one calling Nick a liar.

You just take him at his word then?

 

[kmoney]

Let's keep it simple.

Nick, do you have any evidence that Fanning has molested children?

 

[fool]

I think he's the guy who gets the coffee at meetings

Secretary, Flight Attendant and Nurse are three occupations where I assume that if a guy is working them then he's gay.

 

[rexlunae]

Let's keep it simple.

Nick, do you have any evidence that Fanning has molested children?

I think even that gives him too much credit. If he had actual evidence, he would have stated it at the outset. He's just a bigot. Asking him for evidence is like demanding that stones compose a symphony. All you'll get is silence.

 

[fool]

If you have not seen it. It does not exist. I get it.

Delmar do you think a person should have some evidence of someone being a pedophile before they call them one or is that an accusation that you take lightly?

 

[Stripe]

Delmar do you think a person should have some evidence of someone being a pedophile before they call them one or is that an accusation that you take lightly?

The evidence was already presented: The guy's a homo.

 

[rexlunae]

The evidence was already presented: The guy's a homo.

Fail.

 

[Stripe]

Fail.

Great argument. lain:

The guy's a homo; he's perverted normal practice. It deserves investigation, not reward.

 

[shagster01]

Nick just has a guilty conscience. He feels the need to divert the attention.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[CabinetMaker]

The evidence was already presented: The guy's a homo.

Would you be willing to stand before God as a witness and attest that you witnessed the man sexually asulting children? If not, why would you be willing to state that on a public forum?

What about you Nick M. will stand before God and swear that you witnessed this man sexually assaulting children?

 

[shagster01]

If you have not seen it. It does not exist. I get it.

So what you are saying is that though I have seen no evidence against you for any crime, it may exist, and therefore it makes sense to publicly declare you guilty? :think:

For example, many gun owners commit crimes and you are a gun owner....

 

[rexlunae]

Great argument. lain:

You didn't present an argument. You just revealed yourself to be incapable of making a rather simple distinction. What do you expect?

 

[Stripe]

Would you be willing to stand before God as a witness and attest that you witnessed the man sexually asulting children? If not, why would you be willing to state that on a public forum?

Trust you to get everything utterly wrong.

I called the guy a homo. I don't think anybody is debating that. :idunno:

 

[Stripe]

You didn't present an argument.

Sure, I did. Try reading. :thumb: