Maricopa county ballot audit begins today

marke

Well-known member
Whoopsie!

Auditors to democrat and leftist elections officials: 'We would like to see the chain-of-custody-records for all ballots which were required by law to have accompanied all ballots in the 2020 election.'

Democrats: 'Go to hell. We will give you what we want to give you but not a damm thing more.'
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Auditors to democrat and leftist elections officials: 'We would like to see the chain-of-custody-records for all ballots which were required by law to have accompanied all ballots in the 2020 election.'

Democrats: 'Go to hell. We will give you what we want to give you but not a damm thing more.'
I used to work in a Forensic toxicology lab. The chain of custody paperwork was 2/3 of the job.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Auditors to democrat and leftist elections officials: 'We would like to see the chain-of-custody-records for all ballots which were required by law to have accompanied all ballots in the 2020 election.'

Democrats: 'Go to hell. We will give you what we want to give you but not a damm thing more.'
Translation: “We don’t have it, and we know we’re about to go to jail, so we’ll pretend to be offended.”
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
If the military buys a toilet seat, there's a chain of custody list a mile long, but when it comes to ballot chain of custody? Eh, who gives a rip...
 

marke

Well-known member
If the military buys a toilet seat, there's a chain of custody list a mile long, but when it comes to ballot chain of custody? Eh, who gives a rip...
Leftists claim that the chain of custody is lost if they give investigators their voting records and ballots for audits. That is another democrat lie. One of the biggest problems with so many democrat vote counts is their clear loss of chain of custody records for their late-night ballot dumps. Chain of custody requirements were enacted by responsible lawmakers to prevent voter fraud, and yet we saw massive failures to maintain chain of custody records in many big democrat precincts in 2020. Every precinct which has lost chain of custody records for their ballots should also be deeply audited.


Chain of custody
According to experts, the only way to know if an electronic vote total has been hacked is for voters to have separately recorded their intended selections on paper and for jurisdictions to then use the paper in a manual audit or recount, the results of which can be compared to the electronic total.
But even manual audits or recounts can be “hacked” if the selections on the paper have been marked by a machine, rather than the voter’s own hand. And no matter how that paper is marked, manual audits and recounts can be gamed if the chain of custody between election night and the audit or recount has been compromised.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
"Morning Joe" is some retard with an audience, I guess, who thinks his thoughts deserve to be heard.

Turns out he's wrong

 

marke

Well-known member
"Morning Joe" is some retard with an audience, I guess, who thinks his thoughts deserve to be heard.

Turns out he's wrong

Dumbacrap leftist media tribal barbarian savage propagandist: 'If you don't trust democrats to do everything right, to stand for only what America has long held of value, including God, righteousness, family, law and order, and patriotism, if you believe republicans are good people and interested in promoting good for all Americans, then you are a damm traitor, an evil person, a moron, a dupe among dupes in a basket full of deplorables, a dumb stub among mindless stumps in the forest who stupidly cling to God and guns, and should be run out of the country.'
 

marke

Well-known member
Election integrity is racist against dead people!

Lying leftist dumbacrap defender of new democrap laws destroying voter protections and voting securities: "We cannot remove the names of dead people from our voter rolls in big democrat precincts as federal law requires because most minorities see that as voter suppression and voter suppression is the last thing we want our constituents thinking we are doing.'
 

Derf

Well-known member
What files were deleted exactly? Evidence?

Evidence:
View attachment 1075
I can’t tell what the filenames mean, but there are a couple words I can read: “databases”, which is the name of the folder, and “adjudicableballotstore” with the date of the election.

Hello? Anyone in there? Is Arthur Troll just moving on to another bridge, now that he can’t handwave his false narrative around?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Hello? Anyone in there? Is Arthur Troll just moving on to another bridge, now that he can’t handwave his false narrative around?
Hello? Has it occurred to you that some of us have things going on in life that don't revolve around TOL or replying to you as you deem fit? Grow up.

So, you can't tell what the filenames mean but you can make out the word 'database'. Wow, super convincing evidence there then. Meantime this ongoing farce just goes on...


There's no false narrative going on from me and it's about time this lunacy was put to bed.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Hello? Has it occurred to you that some of us have things going on in life that don't revolve around TOL or replying to you as you deem fit? Grow up.

So, you can't tell what the filenames mean but you can make out the word 'database'. Wow, super convincing evidence there then. Meantime this ongoing farce just goes on...


There's no false narrative going on from me and it's about time this lunacy was put to bed.
I agree that your lunacy should be put to bed, but you did ask for evidence, which you chose to ignore, when provided. You have no answer to the evidence as provided, because it is evidence. There’s some question about what the evidence means, but your narrative has been that there is NO evidence. Now you should at least be honorable and change your narrative, rather than going on to a different conversation. Else, you’re a troll. Stop being a troll, Brain.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
I agree that your lunacy should be put to bed, but you did ask for evidence, which you chose to ignore, when provided. You have no answer to the evidence as provided, because it is evidence. There’s some question about what the evidence means, but your narrative has been that there is NO evidence. Now you should at least be honorable and change your narrative, rather than going on to a different conversation. Else, you’re a troll. Stop being a troll, Brain.
I think the chances of that, because of a long history of trolling, is somewhere around or below 0.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I agree that your lunacy should be put to bed, but you did ask for evidence, which you chose to ignore, when provided. You have no answer to the evidence as provided, because it is evidence. There’s some question about what the evidence means, but your narrative has been that there is NO evidence. Now you should at least be honorable and change your narrative, rather than going on to a different conversation. Else, you’re a troll. Stop being a troll, Brain.
What lunacy would that be exactly? Not buying into this ridiculous charade of voter fraud? I asked you for evidence alright and what did you provide? Some snapshot where you couldn't make out the file words apart from 'database'? Oh, well, stop the presses...That is not evidence Derf so try again with something substantial, which is gonna be hard.

The "different conversation" you're trying to allude to is directly connected to what's going on so I've no need to 'change narrative' as this so called 'evidence' of fraud is still wanting. Your latter isn't worth addressing. Either debate on point or don't bother.
 

Derf

Well-known member
What lunacy would that be exactly? Not buying into this ridiculous charade of voter fraud? I asked you for evidence alright and what did you provide? Some snapshot where you couldn't make out the file words apart from 'database'? Oh, well, stop the presses...That is not evidence Derf so try again with something substantial, which is gonna be hard.

The "different conversation" you're trying to allude to is directly connected to what's going on so I've no need to 'change narrative' as this so called 'evidence' of fraud is still wanting. Your latter isn't worth addressing. Either debate on point or don't bother.
Once again, the leftist projects his inability to stay on a topic when he can’t refute it, onto the conservative. Just because I don’t have the best copies of the evidence doesn’t mean the evidence doesn’t exist in its proper form. If that’s something you’re unable to comprehend, I have a hard time seeing how anything you offer is worth the time—because you’re just trolling.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Once again, the leftist projects his inability to stay on a topic when he can’t refute it, onto the conservative. Just because I don’t have the best copies of the evidence doesn’t mean the evidence doesn’t exist in its proper form. If that’s something you’re unable to comprehend, I have a hard time seeing how anything you offer is worth the time—because you’re just trolling.
Oh get over yourself. If you have actual evidence to support your posit then you needed a whole load more than some barely distinguishable snapshot of something. I'm not a "leftist" even if anyone who isn't on board with widespread fraud computes to being one for you so if all you've got is this "trolling" garbage then take a look in the mirror.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Oh get over yourself. If you have actual evidence to support your posit then you needed a whole load more than some barely distinguishable snapshot of something. I'm not a "leftist" even if anyone who isn't on board with widespread fraud computes to being one for you so if all you've got is this "trolling" garbage then take a look in the mirror.
I provided evidence. You rejected it. If you are the arbiter of evidence for American elections, then we’re in big trouble. Fortunately, you aren’t. But you can’t anymore say there is no evidence, at least not truthfully. But you don’t seem to care about truth, based on your news sources.
 
Top