Right Divider
Body part
Isn't it funny that they think that we believe that there are TWO gospels?:chuckle:
Isn't it funny that they think that we believe that there are TWO gospels?:chuckle:
This is what I posted:
How do you get that I'm trying to "be God" from that?
I guess that maybe you weren't lying, just dumb.
:chuckle:
So this kind of question is easier to sort out in Greek than English where you go by sense.
:chuckle:
You still have to go by the sense. He didn't mean that the kingdom was good news; it turned out that a person could have a very rough time of it in the kingdom of God, right? There was a Gospel and it was part of or belonged to the kingdom (which also is supposed to be the 'reign' or 'dominion' and is supposed to be translated that way. It is not supposed to be in the category of a 'state' or 'nation.')
The gospel of the kingdom was most certainly good news (gospel == good new).You still have to go by the sense. He didn't mean that the kingdom was good news; it turned out that a person could have a very rough time of it in the kingdom of God, right? There was a Gospel and it was part of or belonged to the kingdom (which also is supposed to be the 'reign' or 'dominion' and is supposed to be translated that way. It is not supposed to be in the category of a 'state' or 'nation.')
:chuckle:
The gospel of the kingdom was most certainly good news (gospel == good new).Mark 1:14-15 (AKJV/PCE)(1:14) Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, (1:15) And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
The good news OF the kingdom was THAT IT WAS AT HAND!
There was also good news IN the kingdom, as the kingdom would have NO sickness and everyone would get healed!Matt 4:23 (AKJV/PCE)(4:23) ¶ And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.
Matt 9:35 (AKJV/PCE)(9:35) And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people.
That is ALL very GOOD NEWS!
The reason that you have problems is that you have rejected the Lords revelation regarding His dispensations."For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost."
Romans 14:17 (KJV)
Meant for NOW!
The reason that you have problems is that you have rejected the Lords revelation regarding His dispensations.
Paul is NOT speaking of the kingdom of God in the SAME WAY as Jesus did when He was on the earth ministering to the circumcision (Rom 15:8).
The system which God had Israel under WHEN Jesus was on earth did have meats and drinks, etc.
Heb 9:10 (AKJV/PCE)(9:10) [Which stood] only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed [on them] until the time of reformation.
Typical CR response.Get saved.
Typical CR response.
I am saved and I would say the same to you.
Why don't you stick to addressing the comment and topic instead of making a stupid and insulting comment?
The gospel of the kingdom was most certainly good news (gospel == good new).Mark 1:14-15 (AKJV/PCE)(1:14) Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God, (1:15) And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
The good news OF the kingdom was THAT IT WAS AT HAND!
There was also good news IN the kingdom, as the kingdom would have NO sickness and everyone would get healed!Matt 4:23 (AKJV/PCE)(4:23) ¶ And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.
Matt 9:35 (AKJV/PCE)(9:35) And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people.
That is ALL very GOOD NEWS!
Good, get lost.It isn't worth it.
This is EXACTLY what WE Mid-Acts dispensationalists are saying. Thanks for confirming that!RD,
the question was whether kingdom meant a geographic area or a period of rule. Also, it has been shown many times that there are a number of great side effects to the Gospel but that does not qualify them as the 'euangelion' about grace.
What a mess you make by smashing these things all together. You must have a massive blender!Jesus did not offer a geographic area that would be 'millenial' and then withdraw it. He wasn't going to set one up. He did do signs and wonders to underwrite his authority, of course. But there are no 'side effects' that were the permanent intended target or display. Only the grace of God in forgiveness that was based on his sacrifice, his ransom for many.
It always was the Gospel that belongs to God's reign which began, but the content of the Gospel was not the reign.
Gospel of the kingdom | Kingdom of Israel with Christ reigning as King at hand, Gentiles will serve Israel and both will be blessed |
Gospel of the grace of God | Salvation freely given to ALL regardless of status of any kind apart from Israel, was a mystery given to Paul |
Good, get lost.
My mistake for taking you off the ignore list.