Saving this one.
What further info have you come across since your January statement that tells you it was definitely has to be Nero and no other?
ECT MADists don't follow Paul
- Thread starter tetelestai
- Start date
What further info have you come across since your January statement that tells you it was definitely has to be Nero and no other?
"widely known" things are not always facts.
You're entitled to your opinions, but your opinions are not facts.
Why don't you try backing your opinions sometimes?
I've been doing a lot of research.
Now it's your turn.
Who was the king described as "one is"?
To date, none of the Darby followers have been able to reconcile Israel's prophetic clock with the events of 70AD, nor have the Darby followers been able to tell us who the king described as "one is" in Revelation is.
I thought you Darby followers were the only one's who knew how to rightly divide?
I thought you Darby followers were the only one's who knew how to rightly divide?
You're entitled to your opinions, but your opinions are not facts.
Why don't you try backing your opinions sometimes?
Go back and read my posts.
I have provided scripture and historical data.
Why are you so afraid to answer the question?
More plagiarism:
http://www.bible.ca/rapture-origin-john-nelson-darby-1830ad.htm
And Craigie, being a Roman Catholic, by his own admission, uses this:
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=5788
Point to the one you made that makes it clear that no one else but Nero is the "one is"?
The flaming actress spams his "insults" wimpy cry, in hypocrisy again, as every third "post" of his have insults, and "personal attacks," as he crys, and wines, and pines.
You pathetic wimp-grow a spine, and take a bow, actress.
Right Divider
Body part
Apparently he's no better at detecting sarcasm than he is at recognizing figures of speech or idiomatic expressions.
Still waiting for you to show us how you reconcile your claim that Israel's prophetic clock stopped with the events that took place in 70AD.
I predict you will do the same thing as Danoh and all the other Darby followers so far, and that is not give an answer because you don't like your only option for an answer.
My NIV Study Bible shows approximately 95 AD. That's proof to me
Your NIV Study Bible also says the Gentiles are fellow heirs with Israel.
Why do you believe the 95AD part, but not the fellow heirs part?
Correct. The punk is so obsessed with allegedly disproving dispensationalism, he spends half of his waking hours on TOL, spamming the same old "cute" sound bytes, engaging in hypocrisy, sophistry, habital lying, ignoring his "family," unemployed, attempting to get even with those meanie dispies, who hurt his wimpy feelings, a few years ago.
His rep on this site, his "ministry," is habitual lying. He is so obsessed, and such a "man pleaser," he/she will allow others, of the "non dispensational" persuasion, to pervert the gospel of Christ, as long as they are "non dispies."
He is a lying punk, fraud, con "man."
Right Divider
Body part
Neither are "In all likelihood"'s
(Rev 17:10) They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for only a little while.
1) Julius Casaer
2) Augustus
3) Tiberius
4) Caligula
5) Claudius
6) Nero
Did not Nero die BEFORE AD70?
Yes, he died June 9th in 68AD
Yes, Bora of Tam, and many TOL members challenged Craigie to continue the debate(loosely employed here-Hilston bloodied him), time, and again, and Craigie said that he would, but he bailed, being the spineless wimp that he is, as his "Darby" spam was mocked.
Plagiarized, from Ken Gentry, as I demonstrated.
That is against TOL rules, greasy one.