The "mark" is as physically literal as the word "world" is in all that.
The mark is both spiritual and physical.
The "mark" is as physically literal as the word "world" is in all that.
The mark is both spiritual and physical.
Probably some ROMAN PHILOSOPHER.Who is the king described as "one is" in the Revelation?
(Rev 17:10) They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for only a little while.
Probably some ROMAN PHILOSOPHER.
Probably some ROMAN PHILOSOPHER.
You're denying that your belief system (Dispensationalism) was invented by John Nelson Darby, and that it didn't exist before Darby invented it in 1830.
Try again Wrong Divider.
It's a king, not a philosopher.
You knew Jerry before 98? Are you Hilston by chance?
Once again, greasy Craigie will not, cannot answer:
Is the earth flat, you sniveling punk? Is "The Reformation" of the 1500's false?
Did you say this, you habitual liar?:
" That's not my argument.
I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Tellalie
AD 70-ism did not exist before J. Stuart Russell "invented" it in the 1800's.
Can you?IOW, you can't tell us who the king described as "one is" is.
Seems you cannot.. Whether it was Caesar, another man, other men, a country, or other gods, that's how I understand "the mark of the beast".
Whether it was one of the Caesars (i.e. Nero), all of the Caesars, or Rome itself, I don't know.
Questions the Mid-Acts View Cannot Answer?CS cannot be Hilston, as Hilston debated Tellalie a few years ago, and picked the the wimp apart, as Craigie "scurried like a cockroach," fleeing the debate. Look it up-the wimp bailed. So, Craigie, if he suspected that CS was Hilston, would not respond, risking being bloodied again.
Why did you bail, Craigie?
Once again, Craigie will not answer-watch.
Can you?
Seems you cannot.
Nope.
The prophetic clock/70AD is just one of dozens of "death knells" to MAD and Dispensationalism.
It's why you, and every other Darby follower on TOL hasn't given an answer.
Other than claiming some stones were still standing, and denying every thing that happened in 70AD, it's impossible for you to give an answer.
Again, it's why you haven't given an answer.
In other words, no, you cannot tell us who the "one is" is.In all likelihood, it was Nero.
Since your Dispensationalism has the beast in the future, you cannot even come close to saying who the king described as "one is" is.
While I'm not 100% sold on Nero, I am 100% sold on the fact that the king described as "one is" was alive when John wrote the Revelation, unlike you, who has to claim "one is" is a future king.
In other words, no, you cannot tell us who the "one is" is.
You knew Jerry before 98? Are you Hilston by chance?
Are you willing to stand by that claim? If your claim can be proven to be false, will you leave TOL forever?
In all likelihood, it was Nero.
Since your Dispensationalism has the beast in the future, you cannot even come close to saying who the king described as "one is" is.
While I'm not 100% sold on Nero, I am 100% sold on the fact that the king described as "one is" was alive when John wrote the Revelation, unlike you, who has to claim "one is" is a future king.
...Ok, now it's your turn...