No, because it is man's own sins why they hate the light.
Again, not sure if you are following where my questions are coming from (hoping) but: Who hates the light? Doesn't that mean God only died for those who didn't/don't hate the light? Why or why not? Doesn't the answer, either way, set you in some sense of agreement or dilemma with the Calvinist? What makes some men hate light? Whatever the answer, doesn't it mean that God didn't die for those who hate the light? If He did, doesn't it nullify your answer? If He died even for these, then you can't use this scripture as the qualifier of what saves men, can you? I hope you are seeing my problem with the answer. I 'think' everyone tries to answer this. It seems to me, the Calvinist answer is the most consistent whether one agrees or not. I simply see all the other answers as inconsistent. Arminians(and some others) believe God knows, not based fully on omniscience/sovereignty. I believe God knows and because He is active, in the sense that He knows exactly what His actions accomplish throughout our whole history, that He accomplishes what His actions are done for. IOW, He doesn't leave things to chance, doesn't 'play dice' as Einstein said.
What would happen if God worked this way, would leave Him losing those He might have otherwise saved. Literally, He'd be at the mercy of events as we are, because He 'might' have done something differently to save someone. I'm very convinced that God will save all those who 'can' be saved. As such, the full number will come in, as scripture tells us. Jesus said He hadn't lost one of the sheep God gave Him. I don't believe He was just talking about the 12. Forgive me for some thoughts toward a Calvinistic end, but I wanted you to see both where my scriptural understanding and thought processes have gone with these questions so you can walk a mile with me. I'm also trying to walk a mile with you as well. Thanks for your time. -Lon
No, it wouldn't. For instance, the ministers of Satan preach a false "gospel of grace," saying that certain "works" of one kind or another are necessary to be saved by the grace of God. Those who believe that false gospel never believe the true "gospel of grace" but instead a false one.
However, there is nothing to stop those people going to the Scriptures to find the truth about that gospel, or at least seek out other opinions. If they never do that then they can blame no one but themselves.
Well, I agree, but if they have a choice, then it wouldn't be entirely Satan's fault so we are back to why some men willingly are blinded.
Only those who choose to read the Bible can ever be saved? What are the odds (chance) of that? Is it chance. I 'think' such theological thoughts makes the desire for salvation in some men the catalyst for men being saved. As such, you'd be a bit like the Calvinist saying that God only saves those who want to be saved (I believe/think). Does that sound right? The difference would be, I 'think,' is that Calvinists say they don't know that what 'it' is that causes some men to be saved and others not because God pursues those like Saul who were against Him. It is a mystery to me why I wanted to be saved and the friend with some good qualities next to me, equally with an imago deo in damage, does not. I simply believe that 'if' God could save him, He would. Such makes me a Calvinist.
Thanks again for walking a mile with me. Be sure to lead the mile in your direction too. Your favor to me will not go unreturned. Thank you. -Lon