Interplanner
Well-known member
In Mk 13 Jesus told the parable of the attentive servants; the Master, it says, might return at any of 4 possible times.
God will destroy the world, if there is another holocaust. The next holocaust will be nuclear; and Islam will be its victim.
Marriage isn't ideal for all persons. There are some things which aren't needed when saving Israel.
I don't know if Barnabas and Paul had women to put it bluntly as literal as the bible, but Paul seems to have adopted Timothy. Anti-family teaching comes from Catholic Church a lot. They pretend the priests aren't married in a special way, and that losing virginity is a sexual activity. One guys don't have it to lose anyway, while women don't feel anything, til they lose it.
When Jesus did not return as promised after he was crucified (in the sky with angels and trumpets above the Mount of Olives) the date of his return got moved ahead further and further.
History is full of those Christians who earnestly predicted and believed that Jesus would return soon.
By the way, if Jesus does return shortly after my comment is written, then do not believe what I am saying...
In Mk 13 Jesus told the parable of the attentive servants; the Master, it says, might return at any of 4 possible times.
Dear Ben Masada,
Don't lose hope. Jesus will return quite soon, after all of our waiting. Two thousand years was a big part of it. That much time had to occur first. After Jesus returns, the devil will be locked up for 1,000 years. After 1,000 years the devil will be let loose again on a new mankind made up of those who didn't learn their lessons while they were alive during this generation. It's all quite lengthy and intricate to explain. Hopefully, this will give you hope. It is VERY Soon!!! You just have to look around and see the signs. There is a fourth blood red moon to happen this year on another Jewish holy day. Have faith.
God Be With You,
Michael
Why do you think the Tanach is the old covenant?Not even a quote but, I am sure you are referring to Paul. Of course, he had to include his own scripture to equate in holiness with the Tanach; even to replace the Tanach if you read Heb. 8:13. Sorry to rain on your parade because Jesus would have never acknowledged the NT as true if it existed at his time.
The Bible is the word of God. This first involves the TaNaKh meaning the Hebrew Bible. These writings are the holy scriptures or sacred scriptures.
1 - Why do you think the Tanach is the old covenant?
2 - The Bible is the word of God, all 66 books.
3 - We already looked at the passage about Jesus and the miracle of turning water to wine.
4 - The scriptures are referred to in the New Testament writings. For example, 2 Timothy 3:16-17 NASB.
If the gospel of Jesus was Judaism, what did the leaders take his life for?
God will destroy the world, if there is another holocaust. The next holocaust will be nuclear; and Islam will be its victim.
...Even Pharisees would address to him as Rabbi and master. (John 3:1,2) What did you expect them to make of him, a son of God? That's not how Jews operate. Only Paul and the likes of him went for the Greek idolatry to make of him the son of God. (Acts 9:20) The problem is that Jesus died too young. He did not have the chance even to become a senior Rabbi with a Yeshiva just like the other Pharisees.
BenM,
my question was not 'what did they think of his career?' It was: why did they kill him if not differences from majority Judaism?
Nuclear holocaust would destroy the world and prophecy would be left unfulfilled, hence is a false prophecy....
In the other news dept, I recall a thread claiming you had died, which seems to have disappeared. What was the deal with that?
The apostle Paul came to understand that Jesus was the promised Messiah (Ac 9:4–9).
See:
The Canon Test: A Study in the Divine authority of the Work of God by Eric Ludy
Interplanner, the Jews did not kill Jesus. Jesus was killed by the Romans and, it seems obvious that you prefer the same lie used by the Fathers of the Church in the 4th Century to transfer the blame on the death of Jesus from the Romans to the Jews because Emperor Constantine wanted to make of Christianity the official religion of Rome and that stain seemed to be on the way. I wonder why Anti-Semitism has to be so sweet. Because of this lie by the Church, even up to the millions of Jews have been murdered by the Church through pogroms, blood libels, Crusades, Inquisition and last but not least, the Holocaust. No wonder, talking to a crowd of Jews, from the Sermon of the Mount Jesus blessed them with the words, "Blessed are you when men shall revile you and persecute you and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely for my sake." (Mat. 5:11) See what you are contributing for the sake of Jesus? I am sure you could do much better than that!
Caiaphas thought that it would be better if he died than for the nation to perish; Caiaphas was trying to save the relationship with Rome, Jn 12 and 18.
Would you please provide me with the quote that Caiaphas said what you claim above? I mean chapter and verse and not two chapters.
In the divine scheme and the message of the Gospel, it does not matter which tribe or ethnos put him to death, but yes, in the details of that week, the leaders sought it, and the crowd at the Praetorium wanted it. Judas also wanted money, so he had a bit piece. Pilate turned the question to the crowd rather than answer it himself.
That's not a description of Pilate. According to Josephus, Pilate did not behave that way. It did not mean to Pilate how many Jews he had to crucify, since as many they were it would satisfy him better.
The apostles taught that the people of Israel wanted it, but that God knew they acted in ignorance. This underscored that all mankind has sinned--has participated in the death of Christ--but also that all mankind can be blessed by it, because it was an atoning sacrifice for all sin.
How about the Prophets whose words Jesus came to confirm down to the letter? (Mat. 5:17-19) They said that no one could die to atone for the sins of any one else. Don't you believe the Prophets? (Jer. 31:30; Ezek. 18:20)
At first it seems impossible, but it was a standard teaching of the apostles that 'if the rulers of this age had understood God's wisdom, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.' I Cor 2:8.
Paul was a liar and Jesus' words in Mat. 5:11 did apply to him for falsely accusing the Jews with the death of Jesus.
You're quite right about the crass use of this in the medieval era. It piled insult onto injury. By injury, I mean that since most of Israel did not join in the Christian mission in that first generation, the zealots influenced enough people to try to succeed in a freedom fight against Rome, an abject failure.
And you are making things worse by reminding the zealots of today that the Jews did kill Jesus which is not true at all. (Mat. 5:11)
As far as I know, Luke-Acts was written (partly) to show that Paul had nothing to do with the zealots. Luke traveled with Paul after a certain point in his first trip, and was his chronicler, and Theophilus (mentioned in the intro to each document) was going to represent Paul in hearings in Rome.
Which never happened as Caesar gave no chance to Paul to present his defense. After two years in Rome he died in his own house arrest.
I have studied this topic at the master's level at Regent College, Canada, and spent a year or term translating THE JEWISH WAR by Josephus.
Oh! So you know that Pilate would never consult the Jews regarding the crucifixion of one of them. But, as you know that not every one reads Josephus, you threw in your coin in favor of Pilate. Not fair!