keypurr
Well-known member
and WHERE exactly does the Bible say no MAN has seen God? You apparently believe this but can't quote it?
Are you saying you do not know where it is Stan?
I thought you were a student of theology.
and WHERE exactly does the Bible say no MAN has seen God? You apparently believe this but can't quote it?
:rotfl: The Unis are turning on one another. :rotfl:
I do not believe that Jesus came from heaven, however the Christ in him did. No man has seen God, Jesus was a man. Proof that the son of man is not Jesus but the Christ that was in him.
.
That's what makes you a "Cultist."
What exactly is a "Uni" according to your definition? I have never called myself that but rather you have simply assumed it from the beginning. It seems to be nothing more than a label for you which is something that you and yours always have a need for because you cannot show from Scripture any of your critical doctrinal arguments and therefore have a need to label people so as to categorize them, shove them aside into a backroom, and nullify what they have to say. I have been called everything from Judaizer, to Monotheist, to Arian, to Uni, (now by you and yours) Kabbalist, Cabbalist, Gnostic, Mysticist, Allegorist, Cultist, Heretic, "Veggie", "IDIOT", "Fool", (again by you and yours) Asceticist, and those are just the names I can remember off hand. Sticks and stones can crunch my bones but all of your names are going to come back to slay you in your end: and my brother Titon will be there to set your house in order, and then he will comfort you, indeed, after having taught you with thorns and briers from the desert like Gideon taught the men of Sukkoth. Yay! the parousia of Titon, he will comfort you indeed if indeed you overcome in that day: for he bears not the sword in vain, O man, and the kingdom of Elohim comes with Power. :crackup:
:sheep:
Labels are just de-scriptions, words. As an 'eclect' I look over the entire context of information and relate those on various points, perspectives and 'context'.
A Unitarian view is just as well as a Trinitarian,....and there is no contention except from one of either point of view, if they are making a case for such.
'God' is still 'God'. - if you can get past the 'word', and into the 'reality' itself, which the word depicts. All else are 'words, words words'
'God' IS.
pj
So "Uni" simply means One Almighty Father?
Well then I suppose I am one of those too.
Jesus is God come in the flesh. Anyone who wants to be saved will bow to him.
You are calling someone you do not know an idiot and also insinuating I might be trying to get you banned when I have never practiced such evil in any of the forums where I have visited but usually have those things practiced against myself by those who hate. You would do well to loose the paranoia complex and get used to talking to other people some of which might actually turn out to be like minded if you would give them only half the chance. There are indeed some, not many, but some, who believe that Paul penned the Revelation, and therefore I asked. As for food; my food, like my Teacher, is to do the will of God: so if you imagine yourself and your food "pooping" on my food then you have likewise proclaimed before everyone in the forum that your food poops on my Teacher because the Word is spiritual food. Therefore you also are now become a blasphemer for calling your brother in all caps an "IDIOT", (which again is the same a "Fool") and for pooping on me, for pooping on my food which came from my Teacher the Master Yeshua, by his Testimony, and thereby you also pooped on his Father and my Father, and his God and my God.
:sheep:
More or less,....since 'God' is 'Uni' (One). This is the essential truth of The Shema....also confirmed by Jesus.
pj
:thumb:
Now you are speaking my language! :crackup:
and WHERE exactly does the Bible say no MAN has seen God? You apparently believe this but can't quote it?
What exactly is a "Uni" according to your definition? I have never called myself that but rather you have simply assumed it from the beginning. It seems to be nothing more than a label for you which is something that you and yours always have a need for because you cannot show from Scripture any of your critical doctrinal arguments and therefore have a need to label people so as to categorize them, shove them aside into a backroom, and nullify what they have to say. I have been called everything from Judaizer, to Monotheist, to Arian, to Uni, (now by you and yours) Kabbalist, Cabbalist, Gnostic, Mysticist, Allegorist, Cultist, Heretic, "Veggie", "IDIOT", "Fool", (again by you and yours) Asceticist, and those are just the names I can remember off hand. Sticks and stones can crunch my bones but all of your names are going to come back to slay you in your end: and my brother Titon will be there to set your house in order, and then he will comfort you, indeed, after having taught you with thorns and briers from the desert like Gideon taught the men of Sukkoth. Yay! the parousia of Titon, he will comfort you indeed if indeed you overcome in that day: for he bears not the sword in vain, O man, and the kingdom of Elohim comes with Power. :crackup:
:sheep:
That's what makes you a "Cultist."
Of course, we have a choice.Who said you have a choice in being saved??? Not Jesus!
God does not drag anyone to Him.NASB Joh 6:44 "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws (DRAGS) him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
God only allowed the lost sheep of Israel to come to Jesus to be saved; they were the people who already had faith in God before Jesus’ ministry. God hardened all the other Jews. Jesus came first for those who already belonged to God. They were God’s but God gave them to Jesus. Jesus said he would not lose one that God gave him.NASB Joh 6:65 And He was saying, "For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father."
Again, when Jesus started his earthly ministry, only those who already belonged to God by faith could come to Jesus to be saved. When Jesus was lifted up, then all could come to him to be saved.NASB Joh 17:2 even as You gave Him authority over all flesh, that to all whom You have given Him, He may give eternal life.
NASB Act 2:39 "For the promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself."
Many are called, and a few are chosen.So God's Truth... what do you think about... NASB Mat 22:14 "For many are called, but few are chosen."
The plan was predestined, not people.NASB Eph 1:11 also we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His will,
Net Bible Eph 1:11 In Christ 28 we too have been claimed as God's own possession,29 since we were predestined according to the one purpose of him who accomplishes all things according to the counsel of his will
29 tn Grk "we were appointed by lot." The notion of the verb κληρόω (klēroō) in the OT was to "appoint a portion by lot" (the more frequent cognate verb κληρονομέω [klēronomeō] meant "obtain a portion by lot"). In the passive, as here, the idea is that "we were appointed [as a portion] by lot" (BDAG 548 s.v. κληρόω 1). The words "God's own" have been supplied in the translation to clarify this sense of the verb. An alternative interpretation is that believers receive a portion as an inheritance: "In Christ we too have been appointed a portion of the inheritance." See H. W. Hoehner, Ephesians, 226-27, for discussion on this interpretive issue.
Your beliefs are from false teachers. You should have checked the scriptures to see if what they taught you was true.You have no idea...
Paul
John 6:46 (NIV) No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.
Do you believe what Jesus says?
After being a Christian for many years and hanging around here for at least a decade, I am wondering if it is possible for people--even for a whole society--to lose faith in God?
If that happens it is not because something they used to think existed does not after all exist.
What if it is because the available language about God has been allowed to become too narrow, stale and spiritually obsolete?
What IF?
When divine nostrums such as "love your enemies" become deadened by hearing and reading them over and over, then the Spirit of Jesus Christ is lost, in my opinion.
I do not believe that Jesus came from heaven, however the Christ in him did.
No man has seen God, Jesus was a man. Proof that the son of man is not Jesus but the Christ that was in him.
Every generation needs a new revival and a new translation of Jesus life, message and death.Yes, of course. Keypurr is proof of it, and it's called APOSTASY.
If one comes to Christ believing He is our Savior and God, and then falls away or back tracks from that belief the truth hasn't changed, he has.
What is stale is the KJV...most modern translations are not stale at all, but life giving.