Greetings PneumaPsucheSoma, I have summarised your extensive article by quoting the first two and the last four paragraphs. Could yo please explain Luke 1:34-35 and Luke 2:40,52.
Kind regards
Trevor
Okay. I will consider answering your questions regarding the Luke 1&2 passages, but there are two issues already.
First, you haven’t actually responded to my post content. Instead, you think it’s a matter of having to deal with selected scriptures that you presume were somehow missed for nearly two millennia in dealing with Theology Proper.
Second, I could spend an hour explicating the above passages (particularly Luke 2, which you likely think is problematic for Trinitarianism because you’re not a linguist), but the likely outcome would be you simply declining direct biblical evidence to maintain your fallacious and heretical anti-Christian position of Unitarianism.
I’ve seen no relenting from you when clear and concise answers are given that jeopardize your preconceived ideas of the Trinity versus Unitarianism.
So... tell me why I should bother. Why would an exegesis of a few verses in two chapters of Luke make any difference to you? You’ve ignored every other representation that has been cited or otherwise given to you, presumably for years and in your every day life from all who would address the topic.
The answers to your question would provide the truth about how the humanity of the Lord could be authentically human and grow up as such, while still remaining unmixed and inseparable divinity. It’s all in the lexicography, not plainly stated as so many insist, just as it always is.
The problem is that you’re here merely advocating an ideology, not attempting to ascertain if the Trinity, because you don’t understand it, is a valid doctrine or not. You’re not here to learn, you’re here to debate and contend for your position.
So tell me... Why should I waste time answering if you will scoff at the answer as you have already pre-planned to do?
If you don’t already understand morphe (inward form) and schema (outward form) from Philippians, then why would you think you would understand my simple lexical answers to Luke 1&2 that absolutely demonstrate Messiah’s humanity being able to progress in natural human development while ALSO remaining divinity by inward form (morphe)?
Methinks you just want to wear out a path around the tetherball pole while you rope the ball.