Arthur Brain
Well-known member
If she was sentenced to death because she had committed a capital crime, no, I would not opposed to doing so.
Well, there's one huge chasm between us then because there's no way I'd be able to push a defenceless woman off a cliff to her death because she'd had an affair or some such. Not a chance.
I'll take that as a "yes, it was a good thing for the man to give up his seat."
To which I say, "No it wasn't a good thing.
The man who gave up his seat was the driver of the bus, and the old man hasn't driven a vehicle in several years."
Seriously, that was lame.
Saying it doesn't make it so.
Nor does your insistence otherwise.
:liberals:
Guess not.
An oak?
Rather, I'd let scripture speak for itself.
The men only brought the woman before Jesus, where the Mosaic law said to bring both.
Jesus would have cross examined each of the witnesses, and had their stories not matched, they would have been subject to bearing false witness in a capital case.
And even if the woman had been found guilty, the Jews did not have the authority to put someone to death for adultery
In other words, it's pointless to try to speculate what Jesus would have condoned, because it was never a possibility in the first place.
It just shows that the law is good, even when people attempt to use it against you.
Your problem, Arty, is that you assume I'm under any obligation to you to answer your questions, just as you are under no obligation to answer any of mine.
That being said, I AM answering your question.
It's just not the answer you want to hear.
No, you're not, again...
You advocate and are now on record for saying you'd be willing to push someone off a cliff if they'd been convicted of a "capital crime". You're not obligated to answer my question in regards as to whether Jesus would have condoned the bludgeoning to death of a convicted adulterer with stones with all legal parameters met but if you were sincere in your convictions you would have.
That you haven't speaks volumes in itself. Volumes of silence but volumes nevertheless.