Arthur Brain
Well-known member
you're whining
Nope, just describing what really should be obvious.
you're whining
You exempt from that? Nope.
It could be, if the disciple involved has purpose.
Quit obfuscating, Artie.
So there has to be meaning behind the judgment?
What about the fact that the wicked deserve justice? Is that a good enough purpose for it to be loving for God to judge the wicked?
Hell is torment for those who will one day be judged and cast into the Lake of Fire. To be in the Lake of Fire will be sheer torment, upon every nerve, in darkness, alone for ever and ever. What do you see it to be?
Quit obfuscating, Artie.
So there has to be meaning behind the judgment?
What about the fact that the wicked deserve justice? Is that a good enough purpose for it to be loving for God to judge the wicked?
You're guilty of the same foibles as the rest of humanity, hypocrisy, lies, selfishness etc, do you deny it?
Stop trying to blanket those people you seem to believe deserving of eternal "hell" as "wicked"
when you're just as flawed as your next door neighbour.
I'm not.
You're guilty of the same foibles as the rest of humanity, hypocrisy, lies, selfishness etc, do you deny it? Stop trying to blanket those people you seem to believe deserving of eternal "hell" as "wicked" when you're just as flawed as your next door neighbour.
If your sole idea of "justice" is eternal torment for other people then obviously, no.
"Unto You oh Lord, belongs mercy; for You render to every man according to his work."
Some of the translators make it kindness and goodness; but I presume there is no real difference among them as to the character of the word which here, in the English Bible, is translated mercy.
The religious mind, however, educated upon the theories yet prevailing in the so-called religious world, must here recognize a departure from the presentation to which they have been accustomed: to make the psalm speak according to prevalent theoretic modes, the verse would have to be changed thus:--'To thee, O Lord, belongeth justice, for thou renderest to every man according to his work.'
http://www.online-literature.com/george-macdonald/unspoken-sermons/31/
why would you think he'd deny it?
all men are wicked
he sure is
so am i
filthy rags on our own
so what?
Define "it".The "so what" bit says it all.
Yes, Arty, you are.
I'm speaking in general terms, and you keep trying to turn it back on me.
Where in the world did you get the idea that I think I'm "whiter than white," or that I'm not "guilty as the rest of humanity," or that I'm not "just as flawed as my next door neighbor"?
This is what obfuscation means, Arty.
Again, I'm asking a simple question in general terms, and you try to make me out to be the bad guy.
Arty, if you can't answer the question with a straight answer, just say so.
I haven't said anything about eternal torment at this point.
I'm just asking if it's loving for God to judge the wicked. Is it?
How about this question:
Would God be justified in punishing the wicked simply because they're wicked?
Define "it".
Define what?
A delusion based upon the primal fear of your caveman ancestors? You know, those people who lived in caves 40,000 years ago who have the same DNA that you have. them
I mean, the real God couldn't actually get angry, or have wrath....since the bible itself condemns those behaviors....right?
And wouldn't torturing people forever be an evil of the highest degree?
So....you people think God evil then. Well. That is something.
Would God be justified in punishing the wicked simply because they're wicked?
Given the topic of the thread and your prior propensity to believing in it then what else is anyone supposed to think where it comes to your ideas of "justice"? I answered you already that it isn't necessarily unloving or unjustifiable to judge and punish people. If it's done in love then it isn't eternal torment. Could I be any more clear?
No, Judgy, I'm not. Repeating the same word or charge as if it gains any more validity doesn't work.
Quite simply, because of the way you like to blanket anyone going to "hell" as "wicked". When you're as guilty of the rest of your fellow man of negative traits then pointing that out isn't obfuscation at all.
You were answered straight up in my last and beforehand.
Given the topic of the thread and your prior propensity to believing in it then what else is anyone supposed to think where it comes to your ideas of "justice"?
I answered you already that it isn't necessarily unloving or unjustifiable to judge and punish people. If it's done in love
then it isn't eternal torment. Could I be any more clear?
What is "it" in the following post:Define what?
The "so what" bit says it all.
What is "it" in the following post: