Doormat
New member
Now doormat, we are finished untill you start answering the many questions ive asked you.
You are welcome to defend your beliefs, or don't. It's up to you. :e4e:
Now doormat, we are finished untill you start answering the many questions ive asked you.
I was going to post Matthew 25:41-46 also until I saw you berating Aimiel (yes, he berated you as well...happy?) So your argument is that eternal punishment doesn't occur because people who are dead have no consciousness?
It doesn't?!?...I said that Jesus never said there was eternal conscious torment in hell. So he rips off a post saying that I should repent of tearing the pages out of my Bible because Jesus sure nuff did say say there was eternal conscious torment in hell, then he posts something that DOESN'T SAY THAT.
As for those not in Christ, a fire can burn but not burn up/consume; look at the burning bush, for instance.
It doesn't?!?
Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Yeah, everlasting punishment. It says that. He would have said that they no longer existed if that were the case, and so would the rest of the Scriptures which point to ECT. They don't.
If you believe the story of the rich man and Lazarus is literal, and the rich man was/is in hell/hades according to the story, it follows that you must believe Jesus preached to the rich man in hades.
If you believe Jesus preached to the "spirits imprisoned in hell/hades," explain what would be the point of him doing that? And if you believe he preached to those in Abraham's bosom, explain why paradise would be called prison and why Saints would have to wait in prison.
I have already explained. God came down to earth to preach to the dead, those who were in bondage to sin (the prison). Here are some supporting scriptures:
Isaiah 42:22 But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore.
Zechariah 9:11-12 As for thee also, by the blood of thy covenant I have sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water. Turn you to the strong hold, ye prisoners of hope: even to day do I declare that I will render double unto thee.
Isaiah 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound.
1 Peter 4:6 For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.
It should be obvious that 1 Peter 4:6 is about people dead in their sin because those are the only ones who can be "judged according to men in the flesh." 1 Peter 3:19 must be interpreted in light of 1 Peter 4:6.
The translators mistakenly joined two separate coherent thoughts into one incoherent thought. Separately, they make sense.
"…the Spirit, by whom also He went and preached to the spirits in prison, who formerly were disobedient."
(new thought)
"When the longsuffering of God waited patiently in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which few, that is, eight souls, were saved through water, there is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism…"
Revelation 20:13 occurs at the end, yet you are implying what? Please explain the meaning of Revelation 20:13 in light of your doctrine.
No, the rich man does not have a body such as we currently have because he has died.
Why isn't an appeal to belief convincing to you?
How is God real to you? How is Yeshua and Ruach HaKodesh real to you?
Doormat, Scripture doesn't answer all our questions. If it did, there would be a whole lot more believers than there are.
I don't think so and the reason I don't is because there are no characters with names in any of Yeshua's other parables.
I had this conversation with my husband and his response was that the rich man had no name. When I thought about that, I came to wonder if people no longer have names when they are consigned to hell. Perhaps only those who's names are written in the Book of Life have names. Perhaps those in hell are only known by the sins they committed.
Clearly the rich man's wealth and lack of care for fellow human being's suffering under his nose got him where he was.
How is it, Doormat, that you are comfortable applying analogy that may or may not be correct but you're not convinced by what is plainly there/simply written? I'm not asking that in a derogatory or condescending fashion either.
No, that was his argument. my argument is that death is a punishment. That's why there is a "death row". And death is forever, so it is eternal. Ergo, death is an eternal punishment. He was biffed because I said that Jesus never said there was eternal conscious torment in hell. So he rips off a post saying that I should repent of tearing the pages out of my Bible because Jesus sure nuff did say say there was eternal conscious torment in hell, then he posts something that DOESN'T SAY THAT.
So I gave it back to him, and rightly so.
But, I don't care what you guys think anymore. Believe whatever you want and God Bless You. Thanks to the moron who called me a troll, right back at you, you idiot.
If Jesus believed your view, why would he give this misleading picture? ... Jesus is truth, not a liar. He is a great teacher, not a misleading, confused one.
He would have said that they no longer existed if that were the case ...
You are welcome to defend your beliefs, or don't. It's up to you. :e4e:
2 Peter 3:7 But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
How does the fire destroy them if it doesn't burn or consume them?
Also, you didn't answer the question: What do you believe 2 Peter 3:7 describing?
There are many things that can destroy a person without relieving them of existence.
And Peter was describing the same as Paul, regarding those in Christ:
Now if anyone builds on this foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, each one’s work will become clear; for the Day will declare it, because it will be revealed by fire; and the fire will test each one’s work, of what sort it is. If anyone’s work which he has built on it endures, he will receive a reward. If anyone’s work is burned, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.
-1 Corinthians 3:12-15
As for those not in Christ, a fire can burn but not burn up/consume; look at the burning bush, for instance.
Tim,
while I admire what you are doing here
I am not following the thread that closely
so
tell me
who besides freelight and I agree with you?
But you don't believe that the lost die in their sin. You believe that they live forever in hell being tormented for their sin.
But look at what Jesus said happens to those who go to Gehenna (Hell) in Matthew 10:28
You had best repent of taking out the words "eternal punishment" and adding in the words "eternal conscious torment".
Or just learn HOW TO READ! I didn't cut parts out of my Bible, I'm just reading what's there and not reading what's not there. Don't have a conniption fit.
For anyone who feels within their spirit that this doctrine is ungodly, and doesn't reflect the true nature of the Father check out toxic bibles, you might break the trance of the tradistionalist hate dogma, and their bible worship cult over the testament of the spirit that proclaims all things are possible with the Creator.