Right Divider
Body part
I agree. I'd like to see some scriptural support. I comes off a bit new age to me.That sounds pretty interesting, but where did it come from? I haven't read such in the Bible.
I agree. I'd like to see some scriptural support. I comes off a bit new age to me.That sounds pretty interesting, but where did it come from? I haven't read such in the Bible.
Welcome to the forum, Soul.
But not omnipotent, omniscient or omnipresent? Why not? And if not, how can you be sure of the "immortal" part, especially when God said they could die? Doesn't "immortal" mean you either can't or won't ever die? Therefore, if immortality was part of God's image in Adam, it wasn't a very convincing part.
That sounds pretty interesting, but where did it come from? I haven't read such in the Bible.
It comes off a bit new age to me.
God didn't "give" man a soul, according to your reference. God did give His spirit when he breathed into Adam the breath of life, and Adam became a living soul. If God's breath is required to make a man live, then that breath can return to God when man dies. But if man can die, he's not immortal. Paul emphasizes this here:Thank you.
Refer back to the middle section of post #559 regarding immortality. Then, consider Eccles. 12:7: "...and the spirit return to God, who gave it."
Then you agree that something extra is needed to help man achieve immortality--he's not created that way, or, if he was, he stopped being immortal at some point.It was the understanding of a disciple of Jesus, a woman named "Syntyche," whom He told was correct (Poem of the Man-God: Vol. III). Jesus spoke similarly in Jn. 5:24 when He said, "...he who heareth my word, and believeth him that sent me, hath life everlasting; and cometh not into judgment, but is passed from death to life."
You are "truly" alive?So, the idea that true Life begins after death when one is born to the eternal life with God is in your view "new age," and thus false?
God didn't "give" man a soul, according to your reference. God did give His spirit when he breathed into Adam the breath of life, and Adam became a living soul.
If God's breath is required to make a man live, then that breath can return to God when man dies. But if man can die, he's not immortal.
Then you agree that something extra is needed to help man achieve immortality--he's not created that way, or, if he was, he stopped being immortal at some point.
So you say. Yet "spirit" and "soul" are both used in Genesis 2:7. "נְשָׁמָה" (breath) is sometimes translated "spirit".God did give man a soul according to my references, as the words "soul" and "spirit" are used interchangeably in Gen. 2:7 and Eccles. 12:7.
And I should trust that reference? Why?God created man with a body and a soul. The body is mortal and the soul is immortal, and thus when the body dies the soul continues to live. However, depending on how the soul is judged by God, it can undergo a spiritual "death," which is still existence, but "devoid of what is true Life and eternal joy, that is, devoid of the beatific vision of God and of His eternal possession in eternal light." (Jesus, Poem of the Man-God: Vol. III)
So you say. Yet "spirit" and "soul" are both used in Genesis 2:7...
And I should trust that reference? Why?
Not interchangeably. God's spirit/breath made the dust come to life. Man's soul didn't exist prior to God's breathing, but God's breath surely did.Hence why I said, "...the words "soul" and "spirit" are used interchangeably in Gen. 2:7."
So as long as you "know" something, the rest of us can just take your word for it? I guess we will see the resolution of every disagreement in this entire forum now. Good thing you finally found us.I didn't say you should do anything. I merely presented what I know to be truth.
Not interchangeably. God's spirit/breath made the dust come to life. Man's soul didn't exist prior to God's breathing, but God's breath surely did.
So as long as you "know" something, the rest of us can just take your word for it?
Correct.You assume my use of the word "immortal," as when I say, "the soul is immortal," to also mean "eternal." God creates a soul, and thus it has a beginning, so it's not eternal like Him Who has neither a beginning nor an end.
What is the beatific vision of God?What I said goes against that interpretation.
What is the beatific vision of God?
BEATIFIC VISION
The intuitive knowledge of God which produces heavenly beatitude. As defined by the Church, the souls of the just "see the divine essence by an intuitive vision and face to face, so that the divine essence is known immediately, showing itself plainly, clearly and openly, and not immediately through any creature" (Denzinger 1000-2). Moreover, the souls of the saints "clearly behold God, one and triune, as He is" (Denzinger 1304-6). It is called vision in the mind by analogy with bodily sight, which is the most comprehensive of human sense faculties; it is called beatific because it produces happiness in the will and the whole being. As a result of this immediate vision of God, the blessed share in the divine happiness, where the beatitude of the Trinity is (humanly speaking) the consequence of God's perfect knowledge of his infinite goodness. The beatific vision is also enjoyed by the angels, and was possessed by Christ in his human nature even while he was in his mortal life on earth. (Etym. Latin beatificus, beatific, blissful, imparting great happiness or blessedness; from beatus, happy.)
Without scriptural support... Yes.So, the idea that true Life begins after death when one is born to the eternal life with God is in your view "new age," and thus false?
Without scriptural support... Yes.
That scripture clearly does NOT say that eternal life begins at death.Refer back to the bottom section of post #562.
That scripture clearly does NOT say that eternal life begins at death.
John 5:24 (AKJV/PCE)
(5:24) Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
Present tense "HATH everlasting life"... not "will get everlasting life".
Jesus spoke of eternal life IN THE PRESENT TENSE ... not in some future tense.You requested scriptural support for the idea of true Life being generated by death. I cited Jn. 5:24 because Jesus spoke of death unto life, that life being eternal life with God in Heaven, which is true Life.
Jesus spoke of eternal life IN THE PRESENT TENSE ... not in some future tense.
Welcome to my ignore list.Whether speaking in present or future tense, Jn. 5:24 doesn't not support the idea in question, for reasons explained.
That is an assertion without evidence. Explain how to manipulate people by only telling them the truth.