You ask a lot of questions.
The Jews have a saying, “Ask two Jews, get three opinions.”
When it comes to scripture, everyone seems to have one or more opinions about the way to interpret it.
Both.
Those without the Holy Spirit will interpret it by man.
Those with the Holy Spirit will typically interpret it by man, but will occasionally interpret it by the Holy Spirit.
The difference made is whether the interpretation leads to destruction or not.
2 Peter 3:16
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. |
Yes and no.
There are a number of phrases in the Bible that do not make sense to translate literally (colloquialisms).
The main message of the Bible should be taken literally, and the translation should lead to that.
The individual whose salvation is at stake is the one that holds the power.
As Paul stated, "Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind." Romans 14:5
Yes
No entity has the authority.
Any entity that claims to have that authority is automatically disqualified the moment they make that statement.
A crowd of faceless, nameless, people that don't matter in the long run.
No interpretation has all the correct answers, which means that no other viewpoint is invalidated by any other interpretation.
None do.
Study it for yourself, looking for the flaws in both the interpretation you hold and the interpretation the other holds. Only after identifying the flaws should you look to see if scripture supports either one.
Yes, you can continue believing one if it is in harmony with the other interpretations you hold and the "more accurate one" is not in harmony with those interpretations.
But that does mean you need to start examining the other interpretations you hold to see why the "more accurate one" is not in harmony with them.
I mentioned the harmony of interpretations.
In one interpretation, God decreed everything from the foundation of the world, and history is merely playing out those decrees in time.
Many people will say this is the most true interpretation of the scriptures that you will ever hear.
In another interpretation, God judges each person for their works, whether they be good or evil.
These interpretations are not in harmony with each other.
One other interpretation is that God did not decree everything but has seen everything in the future.
Another interpretation is that God cannot see the future since it hasn't happened.
Both of these are more in harmony with the interpretation God judges each person for their works.
So, do you accept the interpretation you think is true but is out of harmony, or do you question that interpretation and accept one that you do not think is as true but is in harmony with the other interpretations you believe?