God's Truth
New member
Psalm 22:16; Zechariah 12:10 and Galatians 3:13 also predicts that this man's hands and feet will be pierced, i.e., He will be crucified.
So how is Spirit a kinsman to clay?
Oh, that's right, Jews created the language... God had nothing to do with it. :rotfl:
Thus says the LORD, the Redeemer of Israel and its Holy One,
To the despised One,
To the One abhorred by the nation,
To the Servant of rulers,
[yet future]
“Kings will see and arise,
Princes will also bow down,
Because of the LORD who is faithful,
the Holy One of Israel who has chosen You[Israel].”
וְשָׁפַכְתִּי עַל־בֵּית דָּוִיד וְעַל יֹושֵׁב יְרוּשָׁלִַם רוּחַ חֵן וְתַחֲנוּנִים וְהִבִּיטוּ אֵלַי אֵת אֲשֶׁר־דָּקָרוּ וְסָפְדוּ עָלָיו כְּמִסְפֵּד עַל־הַיָּחִיד וְהָמֵר עָלָיו כְּהָמֵר עַֽל־הַבְּכֹֽור׃
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on [אֵת]> Me whom they have pierced;
and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn." - Zechariah 12:10
Zechariah 11:11-13; Psalm 41, Jeremiah 32:6-15, and Matthew 27:3-10 indicates the Messiah will be betrayed, by a friend, for thirty pieces, of silver, that will be cast onto the floor, of the Temple, and used to buy a potter's field.
Psalm 22:16; Zechariah 12:10 and Galatians 3:13 also predicts that this man's hands and feet will be pierced, i.e., He will be crucified.
In the Old Testament, God calls HIMSELF THE FIRST AND THE LAST. That is exactly what Jesus calls himself in Revelation.
Psalm 22:16; also predicts that this man's hands and feet will be pierced, i.e., He will be crucified.
Zechariah 12:10 also predicts that this man's hands and feet will be pierced, i.e., He will be crucified.
"And God spoke all these words, saying, "I am Y-H-W-H your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
YOU SHALL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME."
Ex 20:1+2
And what do the Christians do? They worship a carpenter that died 2000 years ago.
And that's why they are idol worshippers.
"For all people will walk every one in the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of Y-H-W-H our God for ever and ever."
Micah 4:5
Bs"d
The Christian claim: The betraying of JC for 30 pieces of silver prophesied in Zachariah
Zech 11:12 "I told them, "If you think it best, give me my pay; but if not, keep it." So they paid me thirty pieces of silver. 13 And the LORD said to me, "Throw it to the potter"-the handsome price at which they priced me! So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them into the house of the LORD to the potter."
Alleged fulfillment: Matthew 26:14-15 "Then one of the twelve, who is called Judas Iscariot, having gone unto the chief priests, said, `What are ye willing to give me, and I will deliver him up to you?' and they weighed out to him thirty silverlings,"
Matthew 27:5 "So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself. 6 The chief priests picked up the coins and said, "It is against the law to put this into the treasury, since it is blood money." 7 So they decided to use the money to buy the potter's field as a burial place for foreigners. 8 That is why it has been called the Field of Blood to this day. 9 Then what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: "They took the thirty silver coins, the price set on him by the people of Israel, 10 and they used them to buy the potter's field, as the Lord commanded me."
And now the facts.
As we see in Zechariah, there is no messiah to be seen who is being betrayed for 30 pieces of silver. And no potters fields are being bought in Zechariah.
As a matter of fact, in all of this text in Zechariah is no potter to be found.
No potter to be found?
No potter to be found.
The above translation of Zechariah 11:12 is from the New International Version. It says that Zechariah threw the money to the "potter" in the Temple.
In the Hebrew is written "yotseer". That can mean "potter", but it can also mean "treasurer".
In the Temple weren't any potters sitting around. Who was sitting there, was a treasurer, who accepted the gifts for the Temple.
So Zechariah doesn't speak about a potter, but about a treasurer.
This fact is recognized by the Revised Standard Version, it says here "treasurer" in stead of "potter".
Also Youngs Literal Translation says here "treasurer", and also the Contemporary English Version says here "treasury".
The Stone Edition of the Tanach says: "HASHEM (literally: "The Name) said to me, "Throw it to the treasurer of the Precious Stronghold which I have divested from them". So I threw it into the Temple of HASHEM, to the treasurer."
Also the New World Translation of the Watch Tower Society gives a good translation: At that, J-e-h-o-v-a-h said to me: “Throw it to the treasury—the majestic value with which I have been valued from their standpoint.” Accordingly I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw it into the treasury at the house of J-e-h-o-v-a-h."
So what we see here, is that there is no "potter" in Zechariah, and that the whole NT story about buying land of a potter has no bearing whatsoever on the text in Zechariah.
Also we have here a clear proof that the NT text is so orchestrated that it looks as if it fulfills OT prophecies. But because of the fact that they make here another mistake in the translation, the set up is clear to see for everybody.
And there is more. Look again to Matthew 27 and see what the Christians won't tell you: "9 Then what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: "They took the thirty silver coins, the price set on him by the people of Israel, 10 and they used them to buy the potter's field, as the Lord commanded me."
So here we see that Matthew claims that this text comes from Jeremiah, when in truth, it comes from Zechariah.
Another slip up of the New Testament which is supposedly divinely inspired.
Matthew was not capable of naming the right prophet.
And this is supposed to "proof" that JC is the messiah.
Well, with friends like Matthew, you don't need enemies anymore.
Totally irrelevant. The language,ד ערשצצשר requires the use of את , irrespective of what the source of the language is.
וַיִּפְתַּח יְהוָה, אֶת-פִּי הָאָתוֹן; וַתֹּאמֶר לְבִלְעָם, מֶה-עָשִׂיתִי לְךָ, כִּי הִכִּיתַנִי, זֶה שָׁלֹשׁ רְגָלִים.
Numbers 22:28
Then the Lord opened the donkey’s mouth, and it said to Balaam, “What have I done to you to make you beat me these three times?”
Your magic word Aleph Tav did not turn a donkey into God.
אֶת־פִּי ?
Epic fail.
No used in the same way as previously illustrated.
There is an epic fail here. It is your ignorance of Hebrew. You apparently think the hyphen makes this into one word.
FYI, there is a complete (ie: entire) Tanakh in English which has the Aleph-Tav inserted into the text, as it is "untranslated" otherwise. However, I believe there are certain consistent "conditions" (rules?) involved in the usage.
Another "rabbit trail"? Only YHWH knows for sure? :sherlock: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is very simple grammatical matter. If you knew Hebrew, this whole thread would never have been started.
It's got nothing to do with grammar. (first clue is free) :sherlock: >>>>>>>>>>>>
Who has performed and done this,
calling the generations from the beginning?
I, the LORD [YHWH], the first,
and with the last; I am he.
Isaiah 41:4 ESV
You are saying this based on what?
Here, let's get educataed.:
The word את [et] is the most frequent word in Hebrew . It constitutes over 2% of the words in any text – making it more than twice as frequent as the next word on the list. And it doesn’t even mean anything. That is, it is a structural word that tells us something about the grammar of the sentence. The word את comes before a definite object. It has no equivalent in the English language – and therefore is difficult to translate.