ClimateSanity
New member
If you can't determine which is which in the case of the unborn and Islamic terrorists, then you are wicked yourself.What exactly gives you the authority to determine who is which?
If you can't determine which is which in the case of the unborn and Islamic terrorists, then you are wicked yourself.What exactly gives you the authority to determine who is which?
I guess that makes you psychotic.I am going to copy and keep the above post, together with definitions of psychosis.
You've just added an amazing new twist to the term 'pro-life'.
ExactlyCratering preceded by 24 hours of air leaflets and around the clock TV/radio/social media warnings to evacuate and not be within 1 mile of ground zero. Ample early warning. Just like the U.S. did with Japan.
Civilian casualties always occur dealing with evil.Yeh, no civilian casualties happened at all there did they?
You nasty little piece of pompous work. You could almost have been designed...
lain:
You bet he would.Oh, I'll bet you have. Would have been just as dumb and ill thought out then back then as well I'll wager...
Uh, you might wanna check your posts before sending doofus.
:AMR:
You think Churchill would support your lunacy?
You really are a dope.
:kookoo:
You've overlooked a point or two.I have posted on cratering Mecca before. At those times I also said there should be advanced warning so that anybody with a brain can evacuate. Of course we know many die-hard jihadists will run TO the site, and that's fine too. But this is not the first time I suggested giving warning.
Rubbish! Like the US, we are a nation of folks from multiple backgrounds and we are very proud of our Equality Act. If you spouted your rubbish around here you could get into very bad trouble.But this particular subtopic is all academic. I'm not the one whowe dissipated she'll of a nation is being conquered in slow motion by imported invaders.
You dimwit! We loved Churchill! But he was PM of a mixed-party emergency government (Coalition to you), and after the war we wanted a more beneficial country for all. Mr Bevan's National Health Act had to win, amongst other Labour policies. But We loved Churchill all the way through to his death....... We regard him as the greatest War Stateman of the 20th century.What you people need is a new Churchill...an honest man who will save you from the fire, who you can then thanklessly disregard as soon as his work of saving you is done.
..................Oh dear, did I call okdoser the social democratic party? :shocked:
You've overlooked a point or two.
You're supposed to be a Christian, and there you are, you gungo-ho freak, promoting the idea of killing scores of thousands, polluting a huge area for decades, and destroying the religious centres of a billion or so folks.
True Christians just don't think like tyrants, cowardly tyrants at that.
Fortunately, most....... the huge majority of US citizens don't think like you, but in the event that any bombs were dropped on Mecca or Medina or anywhere else, you'd start a World war, which is probably what you'd like.
Rubbish! Like the US, we are a nation of folks from multiple backgrounds and we are very proud of our Equality Act. If you spouted your rubbish around here you could get into very bad trouble.
You dimwit! We loved Churchill! But he was PM of a mixed-party emergency government (Coalition to you), and after the war we wanted a more beneficial country for all. Mr Bevan's National Health Act had to win, amongst other Labour policies. But We loved Churchill all the way through to his death....... We regard him as the greatest War Stateman of the 20th century.
Chew on that.
Civilian casualties always occur dealing with evil.
Well said. Unlike these clueless cranks, Churchill wasn't a brain dead warmonger who would stumble about putting world stability at stake in some dingbat crusade to blow up Mecca. These cretins are that dopey it's almost laughable.
You don't realize we are in a war with these guys do you? BTW, agreeing on a point of view is not indicative of intelligence.Which blowing up Mecca is tantamount to. If you have an IQ of 140 then there's a decimal point somewhere in that...
lain:
It isn't lunacy, and yes he would.
Churchill would be even more depressed than he was given to being, to know you and Eider are modern British counterfeits of what once was called Men.
Which is compelling except that we aren't.You don't realize we are in a war with these guys do you?
Neither is holding a point contrary to reason. lain:BTW, agreeing on a point of view is not indicative of intelligence.
Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.
Your Pro-life without exceptions...
...he tried to argue that the victims of the Colorado shootings were cowards ...
Sod thinks anecdotes are rules.
Sod believes that an act of man would engender the same response as what was then considered an act of God.
Sod is a doofus.
You don't realize we are in a war with these guys do you? BTW, agreeing on a point of view is not indicative of intelligence.
I'm doubtful that it would work. It could, but then it could just change Islam, like the smashing into bits of the Jewish temple changed Judaism. Like trying to squeeze a watermelon seed.
Either the Church wins, and there are no more Muslims, and those holy sites just degrade and wear away and erode from neglect, or, maybe more likely, they are preserved and administrated as tourist sites, the best preserved holy sites of another Church-extincted false religion that we have.
The Church will win, that's not in question.
The only thing becoming more and more obvious are the holes in what passed for your formal education.obviously you dint google it