There already is.The only 'nuts' about are those who think there'll be some societal acceptance or 'normalizing' of child rape.
:freak:
Hollywood has been accepting it for years so that everything would keep right on going as normal.
There already is.The only 'nuts' about are those who think there'll be some societal acceptance or 'normalizing' of child rape.
:freak:
There already is.
Hollywood has been accepting it for years so that everything would keep right on going as normal.
What does this wacky hypothetical rationalization have to do with the Roy Moore case? :idunno:
It doesn't have to be about anyone in particular, it could be about any pedophile.What does this wacky hypothetical rationalization have to do with the Roy Moore case? :idunno:
The only way it applies directly to Moore would be a twist on the question of: Can you be excellent at your job even though you are a pedophile?Absolutely nothing.
Tell people enough times that pedophiles have admirable qualities and they will start to think ..... hmmmm, maybe we shouldn't be so quick to shun them completely.
I don't think you get his point.Um, and now such cases are coming to light they're being cracked down on, hard and with zero tolerance. There's no excuse for such abuse or any cover ups but the crackdowns on these cases show that there's no acceptance for paedophilia in society or anything to suggest it would be tolerated once these cases are being relayed. The opposite of what Musty suggests...
That's what we told homos that commit sodomy.Who is telling people this?
I don't think you get his point.
That's what we told homos that commit sodomy.
There is so much 'good' in them that we should just look the other way and accept sodomy as normal for two 'loving' men.
It doesn't have to be about anyone in particular, it could be about any pedophile.
Roy Moore is just the pedophile in the headlines right now.
And as we have seen, it all depends on how you spin it or ask the question.
Is it good that a pedophile harmed a child?
Is it good that a pedophile cured cancer?
One shows a perverted quality of the pedophile.
One shows an admirable quality of the pedophile.
Tell people enough times that pedophiles have admirable qualities and they will start to think ..... hmmmm, maybe we shouldn't be so quick to shun them completely.
I'm just making up stats now as a hypothetical of ways to show pedophiles in an admirable light:
__ % of Nobel Prize winners were pedophiles.
__ % of rocket scientists are pedophiles.
__ % of medical breakthroughs were discovered by pedophiles.
__ % of the wealthiest people were pedophiles.
__ % of Doctors are pedophiles.
The slow boil of allowing everything from abortion to LGBTQIA has made you naive in thinking that society has reached it's peak of perversion.He doesn't have one. Anybody who thinks there's a danger of child rape being tolerated by society is quite simply, a nutcase.
:AMR:
The slow boil of allowing everything from abortion to LGBTQIA has made you naive in thinking that society has reached it's peak of perversion.
I don't think you've seen nutin' yet.
The slow boil of allowing everything from abortion to LGBTQIA has made you naive in thinking that society has reached it's peak of perversion.
I don't think you've seen nutin' yet.
No, are you?Are you on crack or something?
Right, people would be praising him for doing such a good job.If a child molester happened to find the cure for cancer then their findings would doubtless be utilized for the common good
No argument.but that in no way would absolve the person for their crimes.
Because you say so?There is no way that society would tolerate child rape or rape and sexual assault in general and it's asinine and dishonest to suggest that it would. It's pathetic to suggest otherwise.
No, are you?
Right, people would be praising him for doing such a good job.
No argument.
No argument.
Because you say so?
Because you think society has reached it's peak of perversion?
Have you not noticed all the times in history that society in general has cried "No way that will ever happen!", just to have it later happen?
And for the record for all those that jump to conclusions, I hope it doesn't happen.
But I also am not prepared to say it never will.
I'm old, and I've seen society's morals decline a lot in just my lifetime about things I thought would never happen.
You may have me mixed up with someone else, because I have stated right here in this thread that I am GLAD child molestation has come to head and is being exposed.child molestation is more severely punished now than it was in previous years.
I can remember when it was legal to traffic in child porn, and when young girls who were molested by older men, had to hide away to have their baby because no one would believe them.
Then take your paranoid "slippery slope" fallacies and hug them if ya want. You're a loony if you think that child molestation would ever be accepted and all manner of laws support that. You just keep with your silly paranoia. You will anyway no matter what facts are presented...
It's hard to discuss this with someone like you that thinks society has reached it's pinnacle of depravity.What you are is out of touch. Laws in regards to protecting children have exponentially increased over the years. This is fact. If you want to delude yourself otherwise then you just crack on with it Tam. It's a waste of time trying to reason with people who ignore the plethora of acts that legally back this up. I suggest you look up the 'Human Rights Act' for a start although I doubt you'll bother. You're more invested in some 'the sky's falling in' act and the irony is that there was a lot of abuse going unrecorded in times past where kids had no rights as they have today...
:doh:
You may have me mixed up with someone else, because I have stated right here in this thread that I am GLAD child molestation has come to head and is being exposed.
I'm GLAD there is a mass public outcry.