...There is a ragged edge of discussion that has to be observed when homosexuality is broached. There are so many sides and perspectives to that discussion that it is easily the most devisive topic of all religious and political times.
I wasn't aware that right v wrong, good v evil, sexual morality v sexual immorality, protecting the innocence of children v condoning child rape were things that should be discussed in society ffree...Grip Docility. Perhaps you could explain that in further detail?
The one person named Esset that you linked was attacking your conservative values by making an outrageous statement intended to anger you. Mission accomplished.
Except that I wasn't part of the thread, let alone the discussion at the time Eeset made that statement.
You are concerned that the alt conservative movement and the hyper socialist liberal agenda is empowering sexual deviancy to the point of harming children. More specifically, from reading a small portion of what you linked, I’m seeing that you are warning people that children in general, especially in the United States are becoming more likely victims of perverted sexual appetite that is manifested within heterosexual deviation and homosexual deviation, alike.
Am I reading you correctly?
Them thar are shore fancy words. How about I put it like this:
A large percent of those who engage in homosexuality were raped as children, hence their desire to share that nightmare with other children. The LGBTQueer movement, through legislation (like abolishing age of sexual consent laws) is their legal enabler to do so.
Is that too simplistic for you?
