freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
A tinkering we go......
A tinkering we go......
Don't get freak out,...some belief-systems need to put in some creative 'tinkering' in the 'interpretation' department to fit their context of logic,....all must fit into the pre-figured conclusion,....so a tinkering they go
Of course they could accuse the other person of the same thing, but my commentary on justice and mercy with regards to ECT holds (here and elsewhere), which agrees with some of your intimations on the subject, as we've contested the eternal hell-fire and brimstone 'belief' for a long time here. Old timers on the subject we be :neck:
The book of Rev. was not well received by some early notables, at least it was rejected by some as not being included in some early canons, because it was too 'cryptic', 'apocalytpic' or 'lacking any considerable teachings of Jesus' like the gospels contained (or other reasons). Edgar Cayce's interpretation of the Book of Rev. is an interesting alternative perspective here & here.
A tinkering we go......
:freak:
Don't get freak out,...some belief-systems need to put in some creative 'tinkering' in the 'interpretation' department to fit their context of logic,....all must fit into the pre-figured conclusion,....so a tinkering they go
Of course they could accuse the other person of the same thing, but my commentary on justice and mercy with regards to ECT holds (here and elsewhere), which agrees with some of your intimations on the subject, as we've contested the eternal hell-fire and brimstone 'belief' for a long time here. Old timers on the subject we be :neck:
The book of Rev. was not well received by some early notables, at least it was rejected by some as not being included in some early canons, because it was too 'cryptic', 'apocalytpic' or 'lacking any considerable teachings of Jesus' like the gospels contained (or other reasons). Edgar Cayce's interpretation of the Book of Rev. is an interesting alternative perspective here & here.