:rotfl: Put your reading glasses on, I was not connecting them to any of those names, I was defending them against what Tet asserted.
Personally, I have no problem with being associated with Darby, et al, though some of those men's views might perhaps differ in some areas from my own.
The idea that some within Mid-Acts might have some sort of a problem with being linked in any way shape or form to the earlier work of say, Darby, Anderson, Scofield, O'Hair, Stam, Baker, Jordan, et all is silly.
A9D is only the further refinement of their 2 Tim. 2:2.
As for you baloney comment; yep, looks like that certainly proves your assertion :chuckle: