7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
So, according to @User Name, "Any Republican who does not support what [a RINO] says must surely be a RINO swamp monster!"
Fiona Hill: "The president was trying to stage a coup"
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
My faith informs my political stance. Don't like that I'm bringing my faith into the politics section? Then why are you on a Theology board?
Because, as I have stated multiple times, I have no dog in that fight.
I'm a monarchist. They (politicians, generally speaking) are all evil, and the whole system needs to be scrapped.
The evidence shows that the election was stolen from him.
You aren't wrong that I stated (and continue to hold the position, based on the evidence) that Trump did not, in fact, lose the election, but that doesn't make it "ridiculous conspiracy bunk."
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
There's a reason why there are different sections to this forum and while your faith may inform your political views, nobody else is obliged to address that particular side of your argument. If you want to talk about how Trump needs to be saved and whatnot then put it in religion? Should all of the music threads etc in the 'and the rest' section be spiritual only by way of? Of course not.
Hey, you're talking to someone who is cynical all ends up where it comes to politicians and politics of all brands here. It's constantly bemusing how someone like Trump can be venerated to the point of mindless adulation and that's happened from several quarters on here.
What evidence would that be exactly? Unless you've got something special to bring to the table then yeah, you actually are buying into conspiracy bunk that nobody outside of those circles takes seriously and the results were accepted a long time ago.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Every single post you make on TOL is a loud and clear testimony to the fact that you do not consider yourself obliged to listen carefully, much less to respond rationally to anything anybody says. Duh.
Sarcasm just whooshes right over your head...much like a UFO!So, according to @User Name, "Any Republican who does not support what [a RINO] says must surely be a RINO swamp monster!"
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Feel free to tell us what you "really" meant by your "sarcasm".
Since you call what you wrote, here, "sarcasm":
--feel free to tell us what you really meant by it, by rewriting it now without sarcasm.
Remember that calling your stupidity "sarcasm" whenever your stupidity is subjected to embarrassing criticism is never going to hide your stupidity.
Ray Epps, the pro-Trump man at the center of a right-wing conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 riots, has demanded that Tucker Carlson publicly retract the “false and defamatory” claims he’s pushed about Epps being a federal agent who incited the Capitol riots. Epps’ lawyer Michael Teter sent a letter to Carlson on Thursday urging the host to issue a “formal apology for the lies” he and others at Fox have spread about the former Marine, according to The New York Times. “The fanciful notions that Mr. Carlson advances on his show regarding Mr. Epps’s involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection are demonstrably (and already proven to be) false,” Teter added. “And yet Mr. Carlson persists with his assault on the truth.” In fact, Carlson took aim at Epps as recent as Wednesday night. “The Biden Department of Justice has announced it is going to try and jail another up to 1,200 protesters from Jan. 6,” Carlson declared. “Is Ray Epps going to be among them? Considering he is on tape multiple times calling for people to break the law? We’ll see.” Such retraction requests, it should be noted, are often sent when legal teams are preparing to file lawsuits.
Jan. 6 Conspiracy Target Demands Retraction From Tucker
Carlson has been one of the biggest boosters of claims that Epps was a double agent who incited the Jan. 6 violence on behalf of the feds.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Ray Epps is as pro-Trump as @User Name is.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Who do you suppose funds LUserName?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
@User Name, what's not for you to love about your fellow Trump-hater, Ray Epps calling for people to break the law, so long as his doing so can be used by Trump-haters as props in your continual defamatory attempts against law-abiding people (including Trump)? It's perfectly in keeping with your Democrat/Nazi/antifa "the end justifies the means" mentality; even miscreants like you and Ray Epps can don red MAGA hats as often as necessary in your attempts to disguise the nature and motivation of your crimes as agitators.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Someone to whom money is clearly no object.
Why is it so important to you that Ray Epps be protected?Ray Epps, the pro-Trump man at the center of a right-wing conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 riots, has demanded that Tucker Carlson publicly retract the “false and defamatory” claims he’s pushed about Epps being a federal agent who incited the Capitol riots. Epps’ lawyer Michael Teter sent a letter to Carlson on Thursday urging the host to issue a “formal apology for the lies” he and others at Fox have spread about the former Marine, according to The New York Times. “The fanciful notions that Mr. Carlson advances on his show regarding Mr. Epps’s involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection are demonstrably (and already proven to be) false,” Teter added. “And yet Mr. Carlson persists with his assault on the truth.” In fact, Carlson took aim at Epps as recent as Wednesday night. “The Biden Department of Justice has announced it is going to try and jail another up to 1,200 protesters from Jan. 6,” Carlson declared. “Is Ray Epps going to be among them? Considering he is on tape multiple times calling for people to break the law? We’ll see.” Such retraction requests, it should be noted, are often sent when legal teams are preparing to file lawsuits.
Jan. 6 Conspiracy Target Demands Retraction From Tucker
Carlson has been one of the biggest boosters of claims that Epps was a double agent who incited the Jan. 6 violence on behalf of the feds.www.thedailybeast.com
Who is protecting Ray Epps?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
- @User Name, is it false that Epps incited riots at the Capitol on J6? Yes or No?
- @User Name, is it true that Epps incited riots at the Capitol on J6? Yes or No?
If it's false that Epps incited riots at the Capitol on J6, then what do you want to tell us Epps was doing at the Capitol on J6, @User Name?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Ray Epps, the pro-Trump man at the center of a right-wing conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 riots, has demanded that Tucker Carlson publicly retract the “false and defamatory” claims he’s pushed about Epps being a federal agent who incited the Capitol riots. Epps’ lawyer Michael Teter sent a letter to Carlson on Thursday urging the host to issue a “formal apology for the lies” he and others at Fox have spread about the former Marine, according to The New York Times. “The fanciful notions that Mr. Carlson advances on his show regarding Mr. Epps’s involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection are demonstrably (and already proven to be) false,” Teter added. “And yet Mr. Carlson persists with his assault on the truth.” In fact, Carlson took aim at Epps as recent as Wednesday night. “The Biden Department of Justice has announced it is going to try and jail another up to 1,200 protesters from Jan. 6,” Carlson declared. “Is Ray Epps going to be among them? Considering he is on tape multiple times calling for people to break the law? We’ll see.” Such retraction requests, it should be noted, are often sent when legal teams are preparing to file lawsuits.
Jan. 6 Conspiracy Target Demands Retraction From Tucker
Carlson has been one of the biggest boosters of claims that Epps was a double agent who incited the Jan. 6 violence on behalf of the feds.
Um, maybe (at least) Ray Epps and his lawyer(s) are trying to protect Ray Epps? Did you not read your own copy/paste from The Daily Beast, @User Name? Do youn't consider filing an anti-defamation lawsuit to be an attempt to protect oneself? For Epps's sake, I hope his lawyers aren't as dumb as you are, @User Name!
Ray Epps protecting himself is obvious, nimnoo, and would go entirely without saying by anyone with any sense. Jeff said that Ray Epps is "being protected," which implies that larger players than just himself/his lawyer(s) are involved. Who?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
"Larger players"? That's your phrase, not @Jefferson's. So feel free to specify what (if anything) you mean by it.
"Larger" in what way(s)?
"Larger" by how much (in whatever units of measurement you have in mind)?
No it's not. Ray Epps trying to sound threatening by pretending he intends to try to protect himself is obvious.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You claim:
Epps disagrees with you, and calls your claim "false and defamatory". You're (according to what is said in your copy/paste from The Daily Beast) supporting Tucker Carlson, so should Epps sue you along with Carlson, to force you to retract your claim?
Last edited: