Adding tu quoque to your list of irrational arguments doesn't help you.
Since I have concluded that whatever science may offer will simply be considered as trumped by your well established YEC adherence to a literal Genesis (however rigorous and factually supported the science), then my expressed opinion here is imo more than supported by your past record. A new thread doesn't give you a clean slate Stripe. :nono:
:darwinsm:
We are under no compulsion to agree that there is any such thing as a "species" until you clearly define it. And that you demand we have to accept evolutionism to justify leaving "species" undefined shows how utterly bankrupt your views are.
The royal "we" was it?
King of the fundies perhaps Stripe? :chuckle:
Ad Hominem? surely not...
I doubt that a "species" could ever be reasonably defined for your satisfaction Stripe because nothing must ever be allowed to detract from the YEC approved "Kinds" of course, but perhaps you can help sort that out with a nice clear and succinct YEC definition of "Kinds"?
Meanwhile, my point stands. Evolutionism is protected, while YECs have been persecuted for 2,000 years. Your notion that creationism will soon be dead is utterly laughable.
While YECism otoh is protected by ignorance, blind faith and misinformation you might well be right.
lain: