Apple7
New member
Good memory.
Do you have to believe in the Trinity to be a Christian?
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
Good memory.
Cruciform
New member
Then you should have no trouble actually proving your anti-Catholic claims. Proof, please.
Back to Post #1137.
genuineoriginal
New member
What is your point?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
I already have.
Yer links to a website by those confusing fasting with abstinence and celibate nuns and priests which has until recently been MANDATORY was an epic fail.
A totally lame attempt at white washing the sinful practices of Catholicism.
RevTestament
New member
Obviously that being mentioned thrice make God a trinity....
so being mentioned some odd 6000 times in the Tanakh gets 1/2 of one of the 12 segments of the 144,000 of Rev 7 there....
Infallible logic at work...as always with Apple.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
I didn't post anything about Catholicism except in response to you. You're delusional, and always looking to introduce your Catholic v Protestant agenda.
If you Catholics weren't on TOL braying about Catholicism and picking fights, Catholicism would get few mentions, negative OR positive. You guys are the ones who stir that pot.
The Catholic whore has been put away WITH a writ. Deal with it. It's historical fact. Nobody says you can't commit adultery and be a Latin. Go right ahead.
BTW... I was the most Latin-neutral anyone could be until I encountered you and your croney peers on TOL. So none of this is my latent bias. I've watched you and others for over 2 years, and you have totally persuaded me of the apostasy of the Romamized institution. Congrats.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Indeed...
And we see that circa 2.5 years ago you lambasted the usage of lexicons as being unreliable and 'biased'...arty:
But now...you are paying lip-service only to the term...not that you actually use one, obviously.
Oh...and you promised us 2.5 years ago that you would present your thesis to us in an organized fashion.
Never happened.
Looks like that was yet another lie.
You remind me of the profs that think they have all the academic answers - but don't have ANY real-world experience to back it up.
Just hot air that needs lampooning every so often...
Nope. I've done so many times in many other threads.
You are among the most despicable of non-believers pretending to be a Trinitarian. It's you that is like those profs, and you can't even recognize it.
You have no idea what the ontological Gospel is; and you have no idea how Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all distinct and eternal, uncreated deity.
Come meet me in person and we'll discuss it, keyboard warrior. You could be enlightened by the truth and actually get saved. You'd melt under the annointing of the truth. Aletheia. You need it. It would make you free from your arrogance as the pride of life.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Yeah, well both of those people aren't even on TOL.
No Protestant group has informed me of much if anything about Catholicism. I've researched it myself, and mostly from RCC's own dogma. I've read every ante-Nicene Patristic writing extant, and most of everything else through the 1054 Schism and beyond. I've read much of the Scholastics, including Aquinas. I've also read much of the Franciscans and others.
Of course not. The whore has been put away WITH a writ, and Protestants married Christ alone. They don't want to put away Christ and remarry the whore.
Even Lutherans are autonomous enough to not have their leadership determine such things for individuals. You've been under the Pope's antichrist thumb long enough to forget such things, evidently.
No Protestant group "allows" or "disallows" others to learn of Catholicism.
Yes, I can lead a man to Peter, but I lead them to Christ instead. The Cornerstone.
And the Gospel is known by oida knowledge, not by man's thinking. That's why your whore is apostate. Leading others to Peter instead of Christ, and directing others to think instead of having the mind of Christ.
But you won't actually answer anything. You'll just reference a post number and/or post a link to a Catholic source.
Ciao, St. Nobody.
Cruciform
New member
Please cite the particular post number in which you supposedly prove your anti-Catholic claims.
The assumptions and opinions that you have been fed by your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect are noted.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Last edited:
Cruciform
New member
I didn't post anything about Protestantism except in response to you. You're delusional, and always looking to introduce your Protestant v Catholic agenda. (See how that works?)
If you anti-Catholics weren't on TOL braying about anti-Catholicism and picking fights, anti-Catholicism would get few mentions, negative OR positive. You guys are the ones who stir that pot.
That might carry a bit more weight if you had ever actually refuted (disproven) a single genuine tenet of the Catholic faith on this forum. But as it stands, you have utterly failed to do so, all your man-made sectarian anti-Catholic preferences aside. As your own moto states: "Subjective opinion is not inherently objective truth, regardless of indoctrination and/or majority consensus." Post your proof, or don't bother trying to undermine Christ's one historic Catholic Church.
Your transparent attempt at an excuse for rejecting Christ's one historic Church and her teachings, however, is noted.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Last edited:
Cruciform
New member
Post your proof.
My observation was not that you are necessarily a formal member of any such group. I merely stated the obvious fact that what you think you "know" about the Catholic faith you inevitably learned from various non-Catholic---or even anti-Catholic---sources of information (doctrinal traditions). My statement stands exactly as posted.
How very odd, then, that virtually every claim you've posted on this forum regarding what the Catholic Church supposedly "teaches" has been distorted, misrepresentative, and just plain inaccurate. Looks like you need to read all of that material over again, this time with a far better-informed mind. :think:
Now go ahead and post your proof for your wholly unsubstantiated claim that "the harlot of Babylon" is supposedly the Catholic Church.
That's patented nonsense. Each Lutheran sect sets itself up as the authority which ultimately defines the doctrinal content and "correct" understanding of the Bible of its specific brand of "Lutheranism." If the individual doesn't want to affirm and follow those doctrinal distinctives, he is free to leave that particular sect. But he cannot properly call himself a "Lutheran" unless he's willing to embrace the doctrinal distinctives of Lutheranism. Likewise with every other sect in Protestantism.
Post your documentary proof for your claim that the Pope is supposedly "the anti-Christ."
However, every Protestant sect disallows its members to identify with its particular sect unless the individual agrees with and follows that sect's defining doctrinal distinctives.
Your naive False Dilemma Fallacy is noted.
Still waiting for your supposed proof... :yawn:
False Dilemma and Straw Man Fallacies.
...thus in fact providing an answer, and so directly refuting your claim made here.
Straw Man and Ad Hominem Fallacies.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Apple7
New member
Eh....nope.
Plenty of empty promises, though...
Nobody is interested in reading your constant and pathetic attempts at put-downs, prof.
If you put all that hatred and wasted energy into actually DOING what you said you would, and study scripture, then you might make something of your career.
In the meantime...rage on!:guitar:
WOW PPS, did he touch a nerve?
For most believers, even though they may not know the meaning of ontological, they do know Jesus, and He is the basis of the gospel/good news.
The fact is, when we KNOW Jesus, we don't need to know or have ontology. I AM, is all we need to understand and believe.
We are told to be as children in our faith. Man's philosophy is not child like, it is only his attempt to apprehend God who he won't accept by faith.
Apple7
New member
Indeed....a bulls eye...
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Nope. Plenty of delineation of Theology Proper that you've neither read nor could understand because of your lack of salvific faith and your incessant hate-mongering drivel.
That would be you with your constant hate-mongering.
Your false assessment is noted, imbecilic reprobate narcissist.
LOL. I'm not the one raging. I just pity you.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
You have no faith, and don't even know what it is. Nor do you know the actual Gospel of Paul, entrusted to him by God.
You're just another puffed-up hate mongering heretic and reprobate like Apple 7.
You 'surely' have anger issues. It's obvious.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
Nope. And you don't even know what orge (anger) is, just like the overwhelming majority of alleged professing Believers.
Well, let's just put it this way, I know anger when I see/hear, and read
it. It's really quite obvious to the trained eye, ear, and reading
comprehension. It's pretty much self explanatory PPS.
One doesn't live to be 65 and not recognize anger, PPS. Know what I mean?
Perhaps not. However, I'll accept you as you are.
Perhaps not. However, I'll accept you as you are.