AMR went against me for saying God is Spirit. You follow AMR no matter where he takes you.
I don't follow AMR.
We happen to agree on this subject.
We don't agree on everything.
Is levity prohibited in this thread?
AMR went against me for saying God is Spirit. You follow AMR no matter where he takes you.
I don't follow AMR.
We happen to agree on this subject.
We don't agree on everything.
Could you explain what you mean when you say AMR uses hidden links?
You tried to insult me and praise AMR; sounds to me as if you are following him.
I do no such thing.You misinterpret a lot of my posts as being personal attacks on you.
What I said had nothing to do with you.
I was responding to GR's post in a light-hearted way poking a little fun at his constant austerity.
I do no such thing.
GR speaks against me also. Why shouldn't I believe it had to do with me? This is a thread about AMR's and my debate.
Your put downs mean nothing. You go against the truth in all ways.
The scripture says God is Spirit. Can you stop saying God is essence and speak what the scriptures say?
AMR went against me for saying the essence of God is Spirit. Why don’t you correct him? Why do you think he is so wise for going against the truth?
When I quote AMR, a page of links come up that I have to scroll through.
I do no such thing.
GR speaks against me also. Why shouldn't I believe it had to do with me? This is a thread about AMR's and my debate.
We are all saying that God is spirit. This is a description of God's essence.
I can say that my vehicle is a car or that it is a Mazda specifically. It is made out of metal and plastic (essence). If you ask what it is, I answer above with qualifications.
You are being more than unreasonable. Who is God? YHWH. What is God? Is He a tree? No, He is spirit. What is His essence? SPIRIT?!
This should not be confused with the Holy Spirit vs spirit.
AMR gave you countless verses. You simply make assertions, dismiss evidence without even reading it, whine about a simple link, beg the question with your odd views (vs prove them).
Even if AMR is wrong (he is not), you would have lost or been disqualified from a formal debate days ago.
Fixed. Thanks. Sigh.AMR: Deity, not diety....I knew you were not perfect (half way through your post)....typo, not lack of knowledge, though.:chuckle:
Fixed. Thanks. Sigh.
AMR
Why not share your testimony with us, GT? I would be interested in reading it.I have a powerful testimony. Jesus Christ himself saved me.
Okay. :idunno:
GR, AMR, and I(and others) disagree with your Modalism. It's not a personal thing, though it's true that sometimes the arguments do get pointed.
No, AMR went against me when I told him that God’s essence is Spirit.We are all saying that God is spirit. This is a description of God's essence.
I am glad that I got you to see that. Now, if only AMR will see it so that I can show him more of God’s Truth.You are being more than unreasonable. Who is God? YHWH. What is God? Is He a tree? No, He is spirit. What is His essence? SPIRIT?!
There is only One Spirit.This should not be confused with the Holy Spirit vs spirit.
That untruthful spirit of yours is why you stay ensnared.AMR gave you countless verses. You simply make assertions, dismiss evidence without even reading it, whine about a simple link, beg the question with your odd views (vs prove them).
No one can go against God’s Truth that I am speaking.Even if AMR is wrong (he is not), you would have lost or been disqualified from a formal debate days ago.
You are not a truthful person. I am not whining. Every time I quote even one of his posts, I get four pages of this:Do you want cheese with your whine?
This is like saying 'don't post in bold letters or with green ink' or I won't listen to the content.
Grow up...we all have posting styles and there is nothing wrong with what he is doing. You are just resorting to personal attacks over petty things because you cannot answer his points and the verses to back them up. All you do is spout refuted Oneness dogma based on ignorance.
I have also defended you (your salvation, more important than a theological point or argument) against AMR. I am being objective when I criticize your blind spots, errors, and unreasonableness.
Another substantial post by AMR that may short-circuit GT's brain or cause eyes to glaze over.
AMR has biblical truth on his side.
As a quibble, I do not agree that rejecting the trinity means one is not saved. I would say this about Arians/JWs/Unitarians, but not Oneness, as wrong as they are (they do not reject the Deity of Christ, just the trinity...they reduce personal distinctions to modes/manifestations, a smaller matter than saying Jesus is created vs uncreated).
TD Jakes has apparently renounced Oneness and become trinitarian. I think he was as much saved before and after this. TV guys are not always astute theologians, duh.
If GT objects to essence, she/he/it will object to generation Son, procession Holy Spirit. This is a Catholic, Orthodox, etc. philosophical debate, not an explicit one. Given the eyes glazing over, the basics outlined with the verses will be the focus GT should deal with. Nuanced understandings later in church history have a speculative element and beyond GT scope.