Jose Fly
New member
You can quote where we have been over this before with your quote and my answer.
Or you could just explain what this "easy" rebuttal of yours was. But then, that would be the honest approach.
You can quote where we have been over this before with your quote and my answer.
Its a point he has been proven wrong on before.
Do share
If I were to ask evolutionists what predictions their theory has made so we can test it, I wonder if the "experts" on this forum even know what predictions evolution has made.
Hint: It makes one giant prediction at the very least.
If I were to ask evolutionists what predictions their theory has made so we can test it, I wonder if the "experts" on this forum even know what predictions evolution has made.
Hint: It makes one giant prediction at the very least.
How far into the future are we looking for these predictions? They'll change dramatically with different lengths of time
When I ask folks to show me evolution I get asked a thousand questions.
When I ask for predictions, I get questions.
Just impress me with ANY prediction?
The Bible tells us that a mass extinction will precede Christ's coming. Then will come a 1000 year paradise on earth.
Then will come another mass extinction followed by the creation of a new heaven and earth.
Before Christ comes, there will be a great falling away from the faith of true Christians, at the same time as the World Ruler called "The Man of Sin" enforces a "mark" whereby no person can buy or sell without this mark. But this mark will involve idol/image worship, so true Christians will reject it and be persecuted. Oh, and before the great persecution of Christians begins, 1/4 of humans will die of war, famine and pestilence. That's nearly 1.7 billion people.
Do you see how specific and far reaching the Bible predicts.
Let's see evolution predict ANYTHING.
And they do predict a very BIG SOMETHING.
I just somehow feel I will probably have to spoon-feed evolutionists as to what they believe, just as I had to with a definition of evolution.
For 6days, circular logic is not a logical fallacy, it is a highly developed art form.Codes by virtually any definition imply intelligence.
Nature has no such expectation, yet as you admit, the "message" in a code that nature naturally creates will cause exactly the same reaction as it would had the code been artifically created. No intelligent input needed, just as long as the "code" gets created, whether by nature or humans.A sugar molecule is inanimate and expects nothing. However if Someone creates a code with sugar molecules, the creator of the code expects it to be read, understood and acted upon.
THE BIBLE TELLS US WHEN THE FIRST CIVILISATION DEVELOPED
Evolution teaches that modern man has been around for 200 000 years. Any time during that period, by pure dumb luck, civilisation could have started.
Dumb luck is, after all, the evolutionist's "god".
The Bible teaches that modern man was placed on earth 6000 years ago, then came Noah’s flood 2400 BC making this the earliest starting date for modern civilisation.
All pre-flood civilisations would have been wiped out leaving only traces of pre-flood humans.
The Bible also teaches that humans were not created primitive, but possibly superior to us today. So there was nothing stopping civilisation from beginning instantly after the flood, from a Biblical perspective. There surely were pre-flood civilisations which now lie buried.
There is general consensus by historians that the “cradle of civilisation” was Sumeria. This is exactly where the Bible says civilisation began.
Gen 11:1-2 "And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. 2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.” Shinar = Sumer.
Here is one of many internet sites stating when human civilisation began.
http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?historyid=ab25
"Our knowledge of prehistory derives from surviving objects - the evidence of archaeology. History, by contrast, is based on documents. These various interconnections mean that history, civilization and writing all begin at the same time. That time is about 3100 BC.
Mesopotamia and Egypt: 3100 BC
In about 3200 BC the two earliest civilizations develop in the region where southwest Asia joins northeast Africa. Great rivers are a crucial part of the story. The Sumerians settle in what is now southern Iraq, between the mouths of the Euphrates and the Tigris. Egypt develops in the long narrow strip of the Nile valley.
Rivers offer two main advantages to a developing civilization. They provide water to irrigate the fields, and they offer the easiest method of transport for a society without paved roads. Rivers will play an equally important role in two other early civilizations - those of the Indus and of northern China.
The Indus: 2500 BC
It is not known whether contact with Mesopotamia inspires the first civilization of India or whether it is a spontaneous local development, but by about 2500 BC the neolithic villages along the banks of the Indus are on the verge of combining into a unified and sophisticated culture….”
When one tries to look up how accurate their dating methods are, we see there is lots of room for error. So the above dates are close enough to the Biblical date.
Evolution gave us 200 000 years in which civilisation could have developed. The Bible told us it developed right after the flood, even telling us where it developed. Why is it that in 200 000 possible years of supposed human evolution there is no sign of civilisation, till it bursts on the scene at more-or-less the date stated in the Bible? What are the chances that humans were retarded for 195 600 years or 97.8% of their history, and then suddenly became super-smart? And, "coincidently", this date just happened to be the Biblical date.
Was it because Moses lived in one of the most ancient civilisations that he knew when civilisation started?
There were plenty of other places such as in the Americas that Moses knew nothing of. Was Moses just a lucky guesser?
Either way, it adds great credibility to the Biblical record.
And when on reads how advanced and modern Sumerian civilization was, one realizes that these were NOT PRIMITIVE people, which is also what the Bible says. I will try to list all the mod-cons their civilization had, in a later post.
Uh oh, Davis BJ is out !!
Oh really? And exactly how was that done?
Dear iouae,
Now this is quite interesting!! You've dug deep and hit pay dirt, possibly. Thanks for all of the Hard Work. I know you are trying so much trying to figure out how all of this came to be. I send you accolades!!
God Be With Your Inquisitive Mind!!
Michael
:angel: :angel: :angel: :cloud9: :cloud9:
For 6days, circular logic is not a logical fallacy, it is a highly developed art form.
Nature has no such expectation, yet as you admit, the "message" in a code that nature naturally creates will cause exactly the same reaction as it would had the code been artifically created. No intelligent input needed, just as long as the "code" gets created, whether by nature or humans.
6days' affinity withy Cadry is unusually transparent in this post from 6days. Like Cadry, 6days tosses out some pseudo-scientific claims that he has no real understanding of, but is satisfied just pasting a big "God" label on them anyway. Not even a real pretense that he follows the scientific method, nor understands what comprises information.
Your made up evolutionary prediction was as useful as I was expecting.
But what I was looking for was real science, what serious scientists are spending serious money on, testing evolutionary theory. There is such an evolutionary theory currently being tested, unlike your cute story. But I bet evolutionists themselves do not recognise that their theory is being scientifically tested as we speak.
I know bees exist and that their entire behaviour is very much linked to and necessitated by the material world, so it isn't surprising to me how they evolved including some very specialised and local coding to deal with specific local factors. But by the same token your Creator remains only an apparently non-functional, if overarching figment of your imagination.Tjat is your belief... your attempt at denying the evidence. Codes always require intelligence. DNA is evidence of a supreme intelligence... our Creator.
Speak for yourself!Right, why don't we see evolution in progress now ?