That is a quote from Darwin's wife. Furthermore, Darwin understood he was "killing God" with it, and pulled back, when pushed into it by T. Huxley. He knew that it created a society in which there would be "no faith, no trust, no hope, no honor."
It is the shift of presuppositional base that I am referring to. When evolution was accepted, a 'closed system of natural causes and effects' was accepted, which actually has its roots in Eastern religious thinking, in the most advanced sense of pantheism, but I won't go further into that just now. That is what Darwin himself shuddered at unleashing.
Obviously, it is not what the Christian view is. A minute's reading of the Bible will show you that. The next question is, does nature itself validate either? Well, if you will look at the work of astrophysicists Gonzalez and Richards you will find this: a demonstration that the intricacy of earth's celestial and chemical features is so extremely fine-tuned that there must be a Creator. It is about improbabilities. Not only do each individual feature have improbabilities with more 00s than I can put in one screen here, but all 20 of them must work perfectly, harmoniously, continuously together for mankind to be alive.
