Interplanner
Well-known member
You keep trying to add time into scripture.
We have about 4000 years of genealogies between first Adam and Last Adam.
Except that conservative Dr. Schaeffer showed in GENESIS IN SPACE AND TIME and in NO FINAL CONFLICT how many times those genealogies skip over insignificant figures. That's why the abrupt appearance of man doing history, art, records, tools about 15-20000 years ago is reality. That's why you need to integrate all data, so that all knowledge is stronger, not weaker. We cannot have a situation where the Bible is a separate method of knowledge on its historical and physical surfaces and edges.
There is no "trying" about it. 'ekpalai' is way back before "the ancient world" of 2 Pet 2 and of 3, two different contexts. You're ignorant of what it is saying, even when it is the NT interpreting the OT, and telling us what to do with the expression 'darkness on the surface of the deep' and of 'formless and void.'
You talk like you have a corner on it, but you don't.
Do you mind explaining your background at all?
I grew up fundamentalist. I was exposed to Schaeffer, L'Abri and the Australian Forum in Bible college. I completed 3 years of ancient Greek there and TA'd the final year. I took another year at master's level at Regent College in Vancouver, where I heard and read former DTS Hebrew scholar B. Waltke on Gen 1 and his book CREATION AND CHAOS. I did one term translating Josephus on the Jewish War. About 5 years after my master's in research I was invited to the Am. Assoc. of Pop Culture to speak on how the term 'nature' shifted after WW2. I was only published, however, on one item, which was the 'weak and miserable elements of the world' in Gal 4 and Col 2.
I'm not fooling around or inventing anything. I am finding you lagging in exposure on what the Bible is actually saying.