Interplanner
Well-known member
What part of that did you want me to see? I wondered what your review was.
I'd have to read it to review it, but if you want a review I found you one or two.What part of that did you want me to see? I wondered what your review was.
I'll go along with all that although I'm agnostic about a Creator, but clearly a sufficiently good eye has evolved over a long time and as a result of multiple steps of evolution by natural selection, therefore it happened without a specific objective eye design in mind. A Creator may simply have known that adequate vision would no doubt evolve but without a specific optimal design. Evolution only has to work well enough, but actually being of optimal design probably only matters to a person/designer/creator who would no doubt find that a blind spot was highly unsatisfactory in an organ designed for vision that they would want to put their moniker on.
Look at it from God's POV. Suppose for a moment, He's thinking it over...
"Let's see... I could make nature so that everything I want in the universe will happen as a consequence of an initial creation, with a few basic rules. I'd just have to keep it running.
Or, I could make it so that I'd have to do every tiny thing as a separate act of creation, and periodically change the rules to make it work the way I want. What to do... what to do..."
Our eyes are more finely tuned to color vision. Mollusks can see slightly more clearly, but their vision is probably dull on colors. In terms of having eyes that let you take in the beauty of the world around you, human eyes are second probably only to birds of prey.
Gawl Urban Dictionary
You wouldn't know "Truth" even if your lift went all the way to the top floor...... Ooops, I mean flaw!!
But thanks again for showing the sheer pointlessness of responding.....
Some here will probably say that God micro-manages every atom but that macro-evolution is impossible.Look at it from God's POV. Suppose for a moment, He's thinking it over...
"Let's see... I could make nature so that everything I want in the universe will happen as a consequence of an initial creation, with a few basic rules. I'd just have to keep it running.
Or, I could make it so that I'd have to do every tiny thing as a separate act of creation, and periodically change the rules to make it work the way I want. What to do... what to do..."
Unfortunately, mammals have at most, three primary colors in their vision, and most have only two. The usual arrangement seems to be four colors. A very few humans seem to be true tetrachromats, and can see four colors.
Dinosaurs probably had better eyes than we do; their descendants among the birds are generally tetrachromats and have better resolution. One species of mantid shrimp has 12 different kinds of color detectors, but unfortunately, it's nervous system lacks the processing hardware to use it. They can't distinguish color much better than we can.
Dear Hedshaker,
The context of when you used the word gall means "you've got the audacity or balls to do such a thing." You know it and I know it.
He doesn't periodically change anything he was done on the 6th day.
He doesn't periodically change anything he was done on the 6th day.
Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
everready
That's how it works. Creationists truly believe things are so merely because someone on their team says so.
It's interesting in the context of 6days' repeatedly stating that "evolutionists and creationists look at the same data, but just interpret it differently". That leads to an obvious question: Which interpretation is winning the day?
Given that creationism hasn't contributed a single thing to science in at least a century, whereas evolutionary biology continues to serve as the interpretive framework for all the life sciences across the world, I'd say we have our answer.
Oh Jose!
You're going to get our contribution quite soon indeed!! Check out the month of September. You'll know it when it happens... soon!!
Michael
Oh Jose!
You're going to get our contribution quite soon indeed!! Check out the month of September. You'll know it when it happens... soon!!
Michael
Look at it from God's POV. Suppose for a moment, He's thinking it over...
"Let's see... I could make nature so that everything I want in the universe will happen as a consequence of an initial creation, with a few basic rules. I'd just have to keep it running.
Or, I could make it so that I'd have to do every tiny thing as a separate act of creation, and periodically change the rules to make it work the way I want. What to do... what to do..."
Dear The Barbarian,
Don't you think God would get kind of bored with NOTHING to do at all anymore?
May He Bless Your Heart And Soul,
Michael
:cloud9: :angel: :angel: :angel: guitar: :singer:
Maybe there's a Mrs God, Michael?Dear The Barbarian,
Don't you think God would get kind of bored with NOTHING to do at all anymore?
May He Bless Your Heart And Soul,
Michael
:cloud9: :angel: :angel: :angel: guitar: :singer:
He doesn't periodically change anything he was done on the 6th day.
Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
everready
Your god is supposed to be perfect. Why would a perfect being get bored?
Dear everready,
He would get pretty bored with us on Earth to have nothing to do with us anymore. You see how He has interacted with us as time goes on. I agree with you that He's created everything that He's wanted to, though!! I'll have to give you some good rep pts. LOL!!
Praise The Lord!!
Michael
:angel: :angel: :angel: :cloud9: :cloud9: