alwight
New member
From a rather simplistic perspective yes, you might expect that Darwinian evolution would surely eliminate the genes of those who typically don't directly produce offspring.It's a disadvantage in general. The species would die.
If homosexuality is genetic and evolution is true , why has this gene not been weeded out by evolution? Homosexuals don't breed to pass on the gene. How is it passed on for so long in a large scale?
So why does a small part of humanity remain stubbornly gay despite the hostility shown by the intolerant?
Actually I don't know, and does it actually matter?
But there they are anyway the gay, straight, bisexual and perhaps those who feel that they're in the wrong body? It's just a fact of life and being homophobic about it is mindless, unjust, and often cruel.
Clearly nature isn't perfect and some individuals will get a very rough deal from birth with various abnormalities, being merely gay isn't such a bad thing at all.
Darwinian evolution clearly hasn't managed to eliminate congenital dysfunction genes, why would it(?) because it doesn't care about the plight of individuals since it works on whole populations not individuals who are expendable.
On the other hand there does seem to be at least some indication at least that having some gay people in the population is a positive benefit actually exploited by Darwinian evolution. Having gay males in a family group who are not struggling to raise their own children may well be able help their genetically close sisters to raise theirs.
Whatever is the truth fundamentalist Christians however probably won't care about any of that of course because apparently the Bible makes it clear that God hates fags, right?
What more do they need to hate homosexuals? Clearly not humanity or tolerance. :idunno:
Adherence to the bigotry of an ancient scripture is apparently more important to them than the lives of those who may sometimes kill themselves rather than face any more of it, perhaps from their very own family. lain: