No lecture Jose, but science has proven evolutionists wrong on many things including "junk" DNA, Piltdown man, psuedogenes, poor eye design, "simple" genes, *useless appendix, Haeckel's 'embryo's, *Darwinius masillae claims, *peppered moth claims, Darwin's tree, coelacanth exintinction, Neandertal claims, *Lamarkian evolution, 'Theory' of pangenesis, Darwins tree, archaeorapter, whale evolution claims, Nebraska man, useless human 'tailbone', *female inferiority, *Miller -Urey claims, *Archaeopteryx claims, *scientific racism, 'Lucy' claims..... *etc. Etc.
Science helps prove the truth of God's Word. **
So after seeing one of your memorized talking points be negated by the actual science of record, the best response you could muster is to sputter out as many more shallow talking points as you can in rapid succession.
You've been characterized as a human parrot, a broken tape recorder, mindless robot, and a host of other things centering on the same theme. I suspect this latest performance is only going to further that.
Jose.... you are disappointed that science has junked your beliefs about Junk DNA.
What an ignorant thing to say. I have no "beliefs about junk DNA". Instead I have a wealth of data, all gathered and analyzed under the framework of evolutionary common ancestry and evolutionary mechanisms, that shows some genetic regions are functional and others aren't.
And all you can do is sit on the sidelines with the other creationists and throw rocks.
Its hard for you to admit but even qualified evolutionists are now admitting things in peer reviewed journals such as "the term 'junk DNA' for many years repelled mainstream researchers from studying noncoding DNA".Its yet another example of evolutionism hindering science.*
Again you illustrate your ignorance of basic science, continuing to believe that snippets of sentences are superior to actual data. Despite having this error pointed out to you countless times, you choose to repeat it time and again, even reveling in it.