Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Remember to write your posts in green Art, as it's indicative of the envy that you hold towards those who have actually overcome perverse sexual desires.
:kookoo:
Remember to write your posts in green Art, as it's indicative of the envy that you hold towards those who have actually overcome perverse sexual desires.
Because of course abortion was a rarity before 1973...
Considering I have no issues at all with women who take their families seriously it would appear to be one of your own.
Exactly. The notion that women somehow 'had it better' before 1950 or something would be laughable if it weren't so not funny...
Please don't feign ignorance in this thread too.
So those husbands and wives who took their families seriously back in the 50's and before were somehow different?
I'm not. If you think abortion wasn't rife before 1973 then you're an idiot.
Why did you quote my reply to anna when in context it wasn't relevant to what you're going on about?
"Since legalization, abortion has become so routine more than4058 million unborn babies have been aborted since 1973. In 1996, 1,365,730 abortions were recorded, an increase of well over 100% since 1973, when the annual figure was 615,831, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Between 1974 and 1983 the repeat abortion rate soared drastically - 166%. Of women having abortion in 2000, 42% in Georgia had already had at least one previous abortion. Such a high rate of repeat abortions shows that women are choosing abortion more and more as a method of birth control rather than as a last resort in times of intense personal crisis."
http://www.grtl.org/docs/roevwade.pdf
In addition to women being able to stay home and raise their children instead of shipping them out to daycare because they had to work outside of the home, divorce wasn't as nearly as prevalent as it is today, nor was alcoholism and drug abuse (hence spousal abuse).
The vast majority of women prior to you and anna's beloved feminist movement were part of the nucleus of society:
the traditional family.
And how many unreported cases happened prior to 1973? Again, abortion has never been 'rare'.
Women still are able to stay home and raise their children if that's what they choose to do. They're also free to pursue a career and if that sticks in your craw then go cry into a glass of hot milk with Crucible.
And didn't have the vote, were expected to be tied to the kitchen sink and just put up and shut up etc etc etc...
...banned .... bans....
dude - you're a broken record :nono:
Hardly. That's actually you. What else do you get banned ....
If you think abortion wasn't rife before 1973 then you're an idiot.
rife rīf/ adjective adjective: rife 1. (especially of something undesirable or harmful) of common occurrence; widespread. |
Keep in mind that the sexual revolution started in the mid 1960's and abortion was legalized in several states prior to Roe v Wade. Prior to that, pregnant mothers married the father of their child or unwed mothers more often than not gave up their newborn for adoption rather than opting to abort him or her.
It's a rarity. Single mothers can't afford it and those married couples that are able to afford it are belittled by ignoramuses who say things like:
"...tied to the kitchen sink and just put up and shut up."
Yet they did something that your current feminist movement hates:
Raised God-fearing children.
You have a very tinted view on events from times past aCW
You're unhinged if you think my comment was in any way belittling to married couples who raise families.
How you make that connection is on you doofus. Pointing out how women were treat and denied the rights they have now isn't in any way a criticism of those who choose to stay home and have children.
What, did they all read 'chick tracts' to their kids or something?
Had you bothered to read the articles in my 4 part thread on the recriminalization of homosexuality instead of ogling at pictures of naked men exposing themselves to children at 'gay' pride parades, you'd have learned that bisexual (the "B" in the LGBTQ acronym) Alfred Kinsey's fraudulent research done in the 50's was responsible for the sexual revolution here in America.
You're the one that said the above, not me.
I'm pointing out that people (women included) were way better off before your pro abortion, pro cohabitation, pro out of wedlock sex, pro homosexual feminist movement changed society.
Your hatred of God and all things decent is once again noted.
You mean those pics that were photoshopped and the ones that you continually sought out? Nobody learns anything in your thread apart from how to have a handy sleeping aid on standby in case of insomnia...
Of course they weren't. That's why the suffragette movement came about among other things.
You do realize that the modern day feminist movement is responsible for your enslavement to sin don't you Art?
Poor Art, still denying that the movement that he unapologetically defends consists of a bunch of child indoctrinators/molesters.
Kinsey molested young children in his "studies", quite the mentor your movement has.
The Suffrage movement didn't come anywhere close in ideology to what your current pro abortion, pro out of wedlock sex, pro homosexual feminist movement is.
You do realize that the modern day feminist movement is responsible for your enslavement to sin don't you Art?
I don't support any 'movement' although you can't seem to help having bowel ones on here.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Poor Art, still denying that the movement that he unapologetically defends consists of a bunch of child indoctrinators/molesters.
Kinsey molested young children in his "studies", quite the mentor your movement has.
Let's try to keep things that homosexuals "play" with out of this discussion Art.
You do realize that you sound unhinged, don't you aCW?
The movement that you and Art consistently and unapologetically defend (yet are too ashamed to admit that you are a part of)
And you call me "unhinged"?
I'm not ashamed of anything, least of all whatever you've concocted in your fevered imagination.
Throwing out the "everything" idea in your thesis, the history of the world bears witness to a struggle, almost entirely between men, to dominate this or that section of the globe and of the dominant social group within them to oppress those significantly unlike them. You don't have to be a feminist to understand that, only educated.
Even at the root of history you can't see it. Remarkable. That or you're just trolling, which given how many peculiar flags you've championed seems the more likely idea.