Who Posted?
Posts 1,714 aCultureWarrior
Posts 443 Arthur Brain
3 from last night :chuckle:
oh artie :nono:
dude - you're a broken record :nono:
Based on the fact that society was not drenched in sex and treated it as an idol. These two things would lend themselves to more rapes. But since you think rape is all about power, this would not be obvious to you .
As far as inequality, women were regarded as the weaker vessel and deserving of more protection. With equality came the idea there was nothing special about the female gender or at least the idea sprang up among a portion of society.
Then don't do it, because that's what you've been banned for time and again on this site and it is boring. Up to you if you want to debate and interact like an adult on this forum. If you do then great, if not then you'll end up back in the penalty box. Nobody caused your myriad bans on here but you and only you can do something about that.
Project much?
You're one to talk about 'interacting like an adult' when most of the time I see YOU snarling at everything and appealing to popular bias. That's 'college hipster', not 'wise adult'.
And
With little exception, people get banned for things that other people get away doing. It really comes down to who gets reported by those other people- the most antagonizing and ridiculous poster son here are just good at concealing it. Like Anna
You, however, have outright called for people to be banned simply because they voice something that is unpopular.
Again, college hipster- this isn't your safe space :chuckle:
Well, okay, the obvious answer is no but given that some here seem to think that any sort of 'non virtuous' sexual life can somehow lead towards developing homosexual desires if straight I'd be interested in hearing just how that happens...
:think:
Maybe he'll blame Anna for his inability to use the word "you're" correctly as well...
Really? You think the Victorian era was a puritan one?
Not to mention the women who've been forced to marry their rapist, who've been raped by the victors of war, who've been raped to "teach them a lesson," women bartered for dowries. Oh no, women have had no reason to fight for equality. None at all. lain:
No, in the sense that a fanatic of any sort attempts to irrationally invest his troubles in someone other than himself. That sort of thing.As opposed to when women try to pin whatever they believe on men.
Throwing out the "everything" idea in your thesis, the history of the world bears witness to a struggle, almost entirely between men, to dominate this or that section of the globe and of the dominant social group within them to oppress those significantly unlike them. You don't have to be a feminist to understand that, only educated.They throw whatever they can muster at men to promote an idea that everything men do is to dominate and oppress.
Even at the root of history you can't see it. Remarkable. That or you're just trolling, which given how many peculiar flags you've championed seems the more likely idea.You're being persuaded and then screwed over- it's Adam and Eve all over again is all.
Not to mention the women who've been forced to marry their rapist, who've been raped by the victors of war, who've been raped to "teach them a lesson," women bartered for dowries. Oh no, women have had no reason to fight for equality. None at all. lain:
Sounds like your beloved Islam...
Sounds like the Bible (Deut. 22: 28,29) (Deut. 21: 11-14, Num. 31: 1-18), and more. Plus many other cultures, of course, including Islam.
Who knows what kind of kinky sex the two perverts in the subject title have been involved in their lives. Of course your false premise here (which you've used numerous times before in the dozens of homosexual threads that you've participated in) is that if those who enjoy heterosexuality can't develop same sex desires, then those who have homosexual desires can't enjoy sex with a member of the opposite sex.
How sad that you continue to push these out and out lies Art.
(Give a pagan a Bible and sit back and marvel how they can take things totally out of context).
You do realize that those things are currently happening in your beloved Islam under Sharia Law aren't you?
Exactly. The notion that women somehow 'had it better' before 1950 or something would be laughable if it weren't so not funny...
You do realized they've been happening for the entire history of the world, across cultures, don't you?
Why shirk your own history?
There's nothing credible to suggest anyone has been *cured* of being gay or bi aCW. Telling that some people who were involved in "therapy" have apologized for the damage they've caused if anything. Now go shoo back to your own blog.
It depends on how you look at things: The 30 million or so unborn female babies that have been murdered in the womb since 1973 had it better in the 50's. Heck, children that grew up with a mom and dad in the home had it better too.
I realize that women who take their families seriously aren't really high in your book Art, but that's yet another issue that you need to work out.