The document that I linked plainly demonstrates the wildly inflated numbers that anti-Catholic apologists tend to try and pass off as "historically factual." Don't bother.
Also, don't forget to post the numbers of Catholics executed and murdered by Protestants during the Middle Ages as well. [HERE][HERE][HERE]
HERE is a list of the Catholic martyrs murdered by Protestants just during the English Rebellion of Henry VIII.
Small weight coming from a known public liar like yourself (Ex. 20:16; Prov. 19:5). Google "ad hominem fallacy," since that is the logical error you're engaged in here. :yawn:
Yep, and you ain't in communion with it Mr. Peabody.There is only one true church............
LOL. He's more of a Christian in his pinky then you'll ever be your whole life.The Pope is a Romanist... he is NOT a Christian by any stretch of the imagination.
..........The admonition in scripture is quite simple.
]Acts 16:31 -- And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.........
Actually, what the Lord said in John 16:13 (KJV), He said to His Apostles. This is why we believe that the Apostles taught authoritatively the Christian faith. John 16:13 (KJV) is not a promise to me or to you, that the Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth, apart from the Church, which is founded upon the Apostles' doctrine (which means "teaching," cf. Acts 2:42 KJV).That's not what Jesus told us.
Good post.Every Romanist I encounter makes the same claim, but when it is explored historically, it falls apart.
1.) It was illegal to be a Christian in Rome for the first 3 centuries after Jesus resurrection... if you were found to be a Christian, the sentence was death. (thrown to the lions and all that).
2.) None of the Apostles, except for Paul ever went to Rome... and Paul could get away with it because he was a Roman citizen and afforded certain privileges.
3.) Peter never went to Rome.. unless he had a time machine or transporter. His mission was to the 'circumcised'.. to the Jews.. there were very few Jews in Rome so it would also make no sense for Peter to go there.
4.) The Papal history for the first 3 centuries is a complete fabrication by Eusebius.. and he admits it in his writings.
5.) Rome is under a perpetual curse by God for its conquest and occupation of Israel.
6.) Archaeology proves that there was never a mother church in Rome. When Christianity did take root in Rome, it was to the poor slaves brought to Rome for far away conquests. They maintained their separate enclaves, separate churches and cemeteries and had a huge language barrier.
7.) The entire idea of a mother church in Rome was Romes fabrication, when Constantine supposedly converted and ordered Christianity to be the religion of the empire.. then he set his existing class of pagan priests to morph 'the way' to harmonize it with Roman sensibilities... what came out was a hybrid of Christian and Mithraic beliefs. This is why sacrimentalism came into christianity out of the blue... why eldership was converted into a priesthood (Rome had thousands of pagan priests on its payroll.. it just couldnt dismiss them.. so it force converted them. We also have evidence of pagan temples having their pagan god references chiseled off and replaces with pseudo Christian-Mithraic iconography... etc.
Romanism was invented in the 3rd century and has very little to do with Jesus and the Apostles teachings.
There is only one true church.
The true church is a spiritual church. There are no buildings, nor is there a paid staff.
The true church is made up of blood bought believers in Jesus Christ.
They believe that they have been redeemed, sanctified and justified by the doing and the dying of Jesus 1 Corinthians 1:30.
Can a Roman Catholic be a Christian?
If not, then why not?
(Do not other churches have their little popes?)
LA
Yes. Faith in Christ for a future bodily resurrection to eternal life is all that is needed.
Post #114And you still did not acknowledge your fabrication in your original response... so you fill it with crap to try and deflect people from your intentionally misleading reply.
That's a lie and a dumb one at that......The RCC combined pagan practice with Christian practice....
Post #114
No.
You speak of hope, and a false one for many people.
LA
Post #114Post 114 in no way addresses the issue at hand...
Really? What else is needed besides grace and faith?