No, we learn how to "Rightly divide the Word of Truth". Pretty simple.Phantastes said:....
"Personally I think Theo has dug himself an incredible hole using that principle for criminal justice." - Novice
Well I guess the Bible dug itself into a whole then. Or do we just like to pick and choose what we read in the Bible?
Not at all!Phantastes said:"Personally I think Theo has dug himself an incredible hole using that principle for criminal justice." - Novice
Well I guess the Bible dug itself into a whole then. Or do we just like to pick and choose what we read in the Bible?
The righteous shall rejoice when he sees the vengeance; He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked, - Psalms 58:10Phantastes said:I'm rooting for Theo, mostly because everyone elses sense of bloodshed and violence has made me sick.
Bill Clinton said:I just hate the death penalty.
Rather personal for an organized debate, no? :idunno:TheoQ9: Have you ever broken one of the decrees of the Law that mandate the DP?
That's like a whole other Battle Royale right there.TheoQ10: Does the entirety of the OT law still apply today?
Too specific to the point of being off topic, IMO. This isn't "Should Americans support the current American DP system?"TheoQ12: Do these statistics taken directly from the US Department of Justice indicate any form of racial bias? (If you are unsure, please suggest the plausibility of it being racially biased)
:sibbie: You aren't in this BR! Stop answering his questions!Lucky said:Rather personal for an organized debate, no? :idunno:
That's like a whole other Battle Royale right there.
Too specific to the point of being off topic, IMO. This isn't "Should Americans support the current American DP system?"
You have hit the proverbial nail on the proverbial head.Lucky said:You have hit the proverbial nail on the proverbial head. Too specific to the point of being off topic, IMO. This isn't "Should Americans support the current American DP system?"
At least stop answering his questions SO WELL!kmoney said::sibbie: You aren't in this BR! Stop answering his questions!
:chuckle:
novice said:Not at all!
Forgiveness is a key element in the Bible. But forgiveness must be done in a righteous way. Ignoring the context of God's commands is a painful blister that grieves God as we speak.
Can't wait for Turbo's response to the massive slippery slope Theo has groomed for himself.
Yes, I did... hence my post.Primghar said:No one is ignoring context....other than Turbo...Did you READ theo's post???
novice said:The righteous shall rejoice when he sees the vengeance; He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked, - Psalms 58:10
truthteller86 said:No, we learn how to "Rightly divide the Word of Truth". Pretty simple.
jeremiah said:I guess the question I would have would be for Theo Victus's professor. If he would have allowed a forgiven Christian murderer, to teach Sunday school, and babysit his kids, would he allow a DP advocate, who is also a forgiven Christian, to teach Sunday school and babysit his kids.
I would like to hear how he would have answered that.
I think those who are against the DP on the basis of forgiveness that has been offered to us and the death penalties that we have all escaped should make this their first statement in defense of their position. "We extend forgiveness to all those who have executed, and or will execute anyone who has committed a murder." That should be their clarion call and stated up front in every debate. From their they could go forth and defend their position with integrity and equity. I would like the "professor" or Theo Victus to make such a "call" in fairness to their belief, and understanding of the nature of God's forgiveness.
Primghar said:What do you mean, "would he allow a DP advocate, who is also a forgiven Christian, to teach Sunday school and babysit his kids"? Why wouldn't he?
I would like to know what it would mean if he wouldn't allow that person to babysit and teach...
I would just like to note that your statement, "We extend forgiveness to all those who have executed, and or will execute anyone who has committed a murder," is dumb. It seems obvious from what Theo has written that he believes forgiveness is for EVERYONE (which would include the executors of...the execution--those who are actually responsible for the executions). I mean, if he believes the murderers should have forgiveness, why would the murderers' executioners be denied forgiveness? Everyone means everyone!
So, I think it would be silly to make a declaration of that fact twice.
Also, you used the wrong "their." Silly willy.