genuineoriginal
New member
I gave a sound rebuttal to your preference for the Vatican's Lucifer instead of the Hebrew or Greek words. (here)Hi go. Sound rebuttal to my arguments, sir. Really deep stuff you give us here.:duh:
You ignored it.
It is good to see you found out how to use the smileys, though.
:thumb:
That is your belief.You are right about my belief that the KJB is always right.
My belief is GOD is always right, even if men are liars.
That extends to the translations made by men.
God is always right, even if the translations have errors.
You probably can't see it, but my beliefs come from the Bible itself, not some wishful desire for something that God never promised.
I have read some of the study you have done.But I reached this conclusion from studying the issues more and praying that God would show me the truth.
Your comparison of the KJV to the other translations has convinced me that the KJV is very full of errors and has produced many more false doctrines than any other version.
Even so, it is still a Good Book and a decent translation of the Word of God.
Every thing you put into your article was nullified by your statement that "The King James Bible is always right" because that one statement said all the research was too clouded by confirmation bias to be of any scholarly use.I gave lots of historic and grammatical reasons as to why Easter is correct in Acts 12:4. A lot more went into this than just "He believes "The King James Bible is always right."
Anyone trying to use your research would have to try to pick out the parts that were put there by your confirmation bias and try to identify what you (intentionally or unintentionally) left out because of that same confirmation bias.
The sad thing is that you can't even admit that to yourself.