Do you believe Paul is wrong here and teaching an untruth?
1 Corinthians 5:11 But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.
It depends upon which Jesus they recognize.I think this is sad. They are sending out a man they should be showing love and compassion to. Jesus doesn't save the ones who are without sin. He saves those who are the most screwed up. This church failed to show Jesus that day. I hope that young man doesn't get turned off of Jesus because His church didn't show His love.
Where can a sinful person, no matter what the sin is, find spiritual help but where the Church gathers?
What does the Church do with those who are already tattooed from the top of the head to the sole of the feet before they are saved? The Bible says no no to 'tattoos'. Do we throw them out also? Even though no questions about it, the Lord has saved the already tattooed person and using that person mightily?
How about those who are saved, the Lord is using them, but for the life of them, they are struggling with smoking?
How about those who are saved, the Lord is using them, however, they are struggling with drinking?
How about those who are saved, the Lord is using them, however, gambling has them all tied up.
Should we continue with the list? These are all part of the Church: fornicators, wicked ones, covetous ones, malicious ones. How about those full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers (gossipers), 30 backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful.
And that is what some of you were. However, some are still struggling with some of this.
Salvation is a one time thing, ALL of God and nothing of us. It matters not what the sinner is, did, etc. --- come unto Me all who are tired and heavy ladden and I, JESUS, WILL GIVE YOU REST.
Sanctification on the other hand is what the Church is supposed to teach inside the building. And we are supposed to throw them out? Might as well tell this particular pastor to empty the building and throw away the key, for this is just one example that has come out of the darkness into the light of a saved one in his building.
Imagine if God had thrown out of His Church Abraham (producer of Ishmael), Jacob, Isaac, Noah, Lot (producer of the Moabites and Ammonites - real nice people hiring Balaam to curse Israel as it journeyed toward the Promised Land), David (well especially that David one, adulterer and murderer, without any hope to be able to bring a sacrifice for his sins, for there were none to bring), Joseph, etc., etc., etc. There would be no Bible. No Church. No Salvation. No Sanctification.
The Church is so lazy that it does not even want to bother with those sinful ones, you know, those who are not like 'us,' 'cause we're all perfect and them ones are all sinful and them ones can stain us perfect ones. Throw them all out, the Church tells you. Throw them all out, repeat the Church. No wonder the buildings are empty of the Church and the Church is wondering in the wilderness.
So sad!
Of course repentance is needed for forgiveness.
Whoever taught you differently was either mistaken or deliberately trying to sabotage your salvation.
You like to move the goalposts?
The man in the OP left God to embrace a sinful lifestyle.
No, you have accepted the doctrine of the Pharisee as your own doctrine, and just like the Pharisee you apply it to everyone except yourself.
If you actually read and understand the Bible, you would find out that you can't get anything until you humble yourself and beg for forgiveness.
Find out what the Bible actually states about when God will accept someone.
Acts 10:35
35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.
Risk is everywhere. Freedom itself is a 'risk'.The risk is there.
Arkansas Church Kicks Out Young Gay Man For ‘Choosing A Sinful Lifestyle’
"We will continue to pray for you and your family."
Seems huffington post and this young man who was a 6 year member of this church calling himself a brother - needs to be reminded of this bible verse:
1 Corinthians 5:11 But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.
They obviously also do not understand that being a member of the local church and being able to attend it, aren't the same thing.
This church did the right thing imo, and followed scripture after being informed that he wanted to openly embrace being gay.
Thoughts?
The way I see it is if I join a chess club, the rules state that I shall act in such a way that maintains the good name of the club. People who go around rubbishing other club members or deliberately throwing games to make the team lose in matches or who persistently arrive drunk to a match against another club - that sort of thing - will be thrown out of the club.
This is only normal. This is only what you would expect in any club. In a paid employment, the rules of conduct are even much stricter than in clubs.
So what did this guy expect? Every association has this rule, whether explicit or implicit, that you maintain the good name of the organisation. The church is no exception. If he had a problem with the rules he should not have joined. Instead he now goes around expecting that he is supposed to be the exception to these rules. That the rules don't apply to him.
I will tell you who the rules don't apply to. The rules don't apply to animals. They don't apply to young children. They don't apply to unicorns. They don't apply to idiots. Society would not function if it were not for these basic rules. He is arrogant enough to think he is the exception.
No, Paul is not wrong.
In the midst of the Church inside the building there are members who are greedy, idolaters, slanderers, drunkard, swindlers, and sexually immoral ones, all calling themselves a member of the Church.
The problem is that the Church, for the most part, seem to be too preoccupied with the 'sexual' sin of its members and not so much preoccupied with the other sins.
Can we find an article saying, "Church Kicks Out Young Slanderer For ‘Choosing A Sinful Lifestyle of Slandering Others’" or how about "Church Kicks Out Young Gossiper for 'Choosing A Sinful Lifestyle of Gossiping'"?
Personally, I know of one congregation that was destroyed because of the sin of gossiping. After the destruction had been accomplished, the truth came out that the gossip was a lie. However, the harm was already done.
My point is that the Church seems to believe that only 'sexual' immorality is the sin that deserves a member to be 'kick out' of it.
Did I hear of another congregation preaching against 'gossiping'? No. I asked a couple of my friends going to other congregations if they heard a sermon against gossiping from their pastor, relating to this particular instance I'm talking about, and the answer was that they had not. Why? Maybe because gossiping is not considered to be a sin?
Obviously, I did not hear every sermon in every church building, but in my circle of friends, no one heard a sermon preached against the sin of gossiping.
But 'sexual' immorality, yes, they have heard a couple of sermons, as have I.
Yes. Removing you from membership is not asking you to leave church. It is recognizing you are no longer in compliance with your membership agreement or the standards of Christ you ratified by that membership.Are they also planning to kick out all those who are tempted by, say, adultery, drunkenness, fornication, lust, stealing, lying, envy, or hatred? :think:
Ive heard them on all the things paul listed in that verse. Even if you dont hear them, you admit paul was not wrong, so why would you complain about a church following what you admit is not wrong?
How is "well other churches dont follow it, so..." any kind of valid argument?
Good stuff! Sometimes an argument amounts to 'OK, I know you are right objectively, I can't find anything to contradict you there. But each person is right in his own way so I must also be right.' I am guessing that a good many people just like to talk and have others say pleasant things to them. Admitting they are wrong would never cross their mind. Making genuine gains in knowledge and wisdom or making personal sacrifices was never part of their game - because they are human beings and have a right to be mediocre if they wish to be.
And by the way, I have heard lots of sermons about gossipping. Many more than about sexual morality.
Show me a new covenant verse that says that forgiveness is gained by repentance not given to all believers purely because of the cross.
Acts 26:15-18 15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. 16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; 17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, 18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. |
He can't be worshipping God while remaining in his sin.he didn't leave God since he was sitting in a church and wanted to worship God.
And, I pointed out that your wrong conclusion came from your acceptance of the doctrines of the Pharisees.Wrong. I was only taking your own statements to the logical conclusion.
I did not say God is a "bad dad", that was you that said it.So according to you God is a bad dad who only accepts a Christian if they beg for it.
Same here, because that will split a church faster than anything.
yes and after 6 years as a member he declared he was no longer going to "fight" his homosexuality but embrace its lifestyle openly (his words) and that he hadnt been attending in a while (his words) and that he didn't want to sit there with others anyway being that he now wanted to be open with his embrace of a homosexual lifestyle (practice) all his words.
I wonder if the whiners calling themselves Christians who clearly dont care what that verse says about it, would also defend an adulterer who says he is going to embrace his adulterous affair anyway - and had their membership revoked?
They wanted to play God, and stand in judgment and condemnation of anyone who would not bow to their religious beliefs, instead of humbly passing along the love and forgiveness of Christ. There are a lot of people who call themselves Christians but that have no idea what Christ is about.
I doubt it, most people aren't going to contact a news agency to cry they were disfellowshipped for being a slanderer. Most people already agree, thats a problem and no one is fighting for "rights" for slanderers.
Sad then that the church you speak of, didnt follow pauls edict and remove that person or persons, and there would not have been that problem. I know personally of churches who removed gossips and slanderers before they wrecked the church. There are good reasons paul says to do so, before the entire church is corrupted by those things he lists and before bitter roots take hold. The corruption is already working with you, because you are defending the one who embraces sin, which would make you a divider in the church, see how that goes?
Sad to see you only see churches that dont follow it all.
I would find a better church.
Ive heard them on all the things paul listed in that verse. Even if you dont hear them, you admit paul was not wrong, so why would you complain about a church following what you admit is not wrong?
How is "well other churches dont follow it, so..." any kind of valid argument?
Forgivness doesnt = embracing sin choices