i'm still trying to wrap my head around that whole "God was protecting the first-born of Egypt by smiting them because they were Christians" stuff :dizzy:
i'm still trying to wrap my head around that whole "God was protecting the first-born of Egypt by smiting them because they were Christians" stuff :dizzy:
Or, you could wrap your head around a lamprey?
Oops, wrong tape. Rewind.
i'm still trying to wrap my head around that whole "God was protecting the first-born of Egypt by smiting them because they were Christians" stuff :dizzy:
You're the one who has jumped all over the Bible and have never once succeeded in making it say what you claim it does. Now that you're pinned down, you want to call a halt.
You're just like that Jodi Foster character playing the slut in the bar....promising something you refuse to deliver. Then blaming others for what YOU did. Yes, I'm sure you are "exhausted". :chew:
I told you.....she's a robot. Notice how limited her thinking is? It's because she has certain bits and pieces of tape that she plays over and over again. She's forgotten how to think for herself.
Well, I guess you also read not for understanding.
That's ok doser.
You're so in left field that it is not even worth a response.
I said that I did not believe that God punished David, per se.
I said God PROTECTED THE CHILD.
ok doser said:was God protecting the first born of Egypt when He smote them??
Yes!
If you have any problems with His decision, take it up with Him.
Not sure what's going on in this thread and it keeps jumping from one thing to the next. From what I did read though I was confused how he came to the conclusion that God was protecting the Egyptians first born by killing them with a curse. I don't understand your reasoning behind that. It would be helpful if you could explain your thought process in that instance. This is referring to posts on page 77.
:freak:
was God protecting the first born of Egypt when He smote them??
Somebody better check glory's garage for bodies
Allow me to raise more inconvenient questions...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-Deen-forced-undergo-intensive-therapy.html
Note: others can disagree but I maintain deserve's got nothing to do with it. Personal responsibility for reckless stupidity, however, is a fact of life and a Bible principle. This story proves that point.
Allow me to raise more inconvenient questions...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...es-Deen-forced-undergo-intensive-therapy.html
Note: others can disagree but I maintain deserve's got nothing to do with it. Personal responsibility for reckless stupidity, however, is a fact of life and a Bible principle. This story proves that point.
You don't think she deserved what she got? Really?
Are you thinking stupidity is an excuse of some sort that makes the term "deserve" no longer applicable?
There's also the possibility that they are all simply lying. When people magically line up to accuse somebody of something after one person has spoken, there's always reason to be suspicious of the claims- especially if the accused is very wealthy and their is virtually zero evidence.
She says she wanted to make a sex tape with Deen as a personal memento to celebrate her sexuality