No I did not ask if he liked it. Talk about reading comprehension.
What kind of Sally gets raped by his wife? And what kind of morally depraved human being would air such a thing on a religious forum?
His actions constitute the rape.
Right. The sort of man who would frequent a strip club hasn't been thinking about deviant sex. That's your notion?
Rather, this woman, her moral faults notwithstanding, isn't responsible for the actions of the man who rapes her. He is...and she doesn't deserve what she's getting. No one deserves to be raped for the reasons given prior, both legally and morally.
It wasn't a mistake just because you don't get it.:mock: TH
Another dumb mistake by the Heretic....all while claiming I can't add. But, far be it from me to point it out.
lain: But thanks for making it funnier.
|
|
opcorn:
Stop putting words in my mouth. I said exactly what I said, nothing else. I don't care about your assumptions and conclusions.
Pay close attention. Your conclusion was that since he liked it he wasn't raped. You jumped to that conclusion all by yourself based on his answer. That leaves the only option being: If the gal doesn't like it, it's rape. And I repeated that and asked you to verify...note the question mark.
And I repeated the conclusion you'd come to all by yourself. Notice how that first part, "You asked if he liked it?" is a QUESTION. I did not affirm that you asked him, did I?
Now here you answer my question with a NO and accuse me of having a problem with reading comprehension. Did you misread my question as a statement? Come on....some honesty would be nice here.
Anyway, of course you did...not in direct words but in your round about questioning of the witness. Starting with, "You said....", and he volunteered the information which you then used to affirm he wasn't raped. You said since he liked it, it wasn't rape. It's very important in any kind of reading comprehension that you include the other person's response or you miss something important as you're relating the story.
It's a lot like this rape issue. If you only want to concentrate on the rapist, it's easy to miss the actions of the stripper. It's easy to discount her part.
If you think rape is a breeze and not a big deal then you know nothing about rape.
It wasn't a mistake just because you don't get it.
Originally Posted by glorydaz
What kind of Sally gets raped by his wife? And what kind of morally depraved human being would air such a thing on a religious forum?
A keystroke is what you were hanging that on? Really?
Me? I make that one all the time. I usually catch them after the fact. I also routinely type
alin: instead of lain: And once in a blue moon, if I'm in a hurry or changing notions in mid-stream I'll write their for there or your for you're or vice versa.lain: Or is it that you didn't get it? :idunno: Don't you mean, town Humanist? Save the false note, glory.
That's who you are and why you belong with the company you've been keeping. Fool me once, shame on me. Twice? No, thank you.You may be right. I haven't seen him back yet. He's either dusting off the Bible, or he's looking frantically through his law books. I wait with baited breath.
I can understand why you'd say that. But don't you worry about me and change habits this late in the day.
You know all sorts of crazy things that are mostly extensions of whatever is going sideways in you.
Sadly, from your lips but not to your ear. And that's not funny, but it's fitting.
To what end? He can see naked women on the internet. He could go to a museum. Don't be obtuse.
She's thinking about the money.
"You" insistence? See how easily that sort of thing happens? Anyway, nothing anyone says makes the truth. Rather, my argument and God's nature make the case, your blind eye and deaf ear nothwithstanding.
The problem for you would be that if you're right you just unhorsed your "they deserve it" line of thinking. I can absolutely say that no one deserves to be murdered or raped. I can say so because God forbids both, because the only permissible, moral sex is found in the marital bed.
No, we can say a lot more than that, given He's let us in on things that are contrary to a nature that we've also had demonstrated when He walked among us. Nothing in the scripture you set past this says a thing against that salient point.
Me? I make that one all the time. I usually catch them after the fact. I also routinely type
So, what, you didn't have a counter for the math illustration, but you just had to say something and that was what you had?
Baited breath amounts to the same thing. So keep that popcorn handy.
I didn't add anything to your quote.
Temper. And remember what Matthew said about using that word.
I can't admit that cheese is a mineral.
That wasn't what I said and it isn't the joke, but thanks for making it funnier.
I'd hope so. Any Christian should. And no Christian should ever declare a brother in Christ as a Christ denier...bearing false witness, like calling that brother a fool, is dangerous business.
Being lectured on humility by you is like being lectured on fidelity by Judas.
opcorn:| Originally Posted by glorydaz View Post Leave it to man to declare what would be impossible for God. [/qtuoe] Recognize. It's not rocket science. If it was we could just ask rocketman. Isaiah 55:8-9 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. |