big deal
Temper. And remember what Matthew said about using that word.
Right. The Ten Commandments aren't descriptions of how humans behave, but about how God wants us to.God forbids a lot of things, but that doesn't stop those things from happening.
"They" are? See what I mean? A really bad idea to make as a point if you're going to be this consistently sloppy. Else, no one has said that there aren't consequences for our actions or that some consequences wouldn't constitute just deserts. We're talking about a particular here, rape, and that's no more deserved by a stripper than her murder would be.They are consequences that are DESERVED because of bad behavior. I don't know how much clearer it can be. It's everywhere in the Bible
Happens all the time, in this world or the next.Prov. 11:5-6 The righteousness of the perfect shall direct his way: but the wicked shall fall by his own wickedness.
Of course. If you look for trouble you're going to find it. Doesn't move the point on rape. It also doesn't mean the rain will fall on you regardless of the nature of your heart. And likewise trouble, absent active intervention by God.Prov. 11:27 He that diligently seeketh good procureth favour: but he that seeketh mischief, it shall come unto him.
Right, the righteous and the wicked suffer in this life, but the wicked will also suffer in the next, will suffer more.Prov. 11:31 Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner.[/INDENT]
No, I'm not. You're just attempting to dictate that as the truth. It isn't true though. It wasn't when you called me a humanist, or a fool and it isn't now.You are DICTATING to God what He can or cannot allow.
I don't have scripture to back a thing I'm not doing? lain:And you have no scripture to back it up. NONE.
I don't have to. You know you're making a dishonest complaint because you've already noted the root of it, my typo that didn't work the quotation machinery. That's not adding to what you wrote.Post # 1978 Go back and look.
Originally Posted by glorydaz View Post
Leave it to man to declare what would be impossible for God. [/qtuoe]
Recognize. It's not rocket science. If it was we could just ask rocketman.
See, anyone who can read will look at that and understand, as you did, what the error was and where your words are separate from mine. To try to fashion that into adding or altering your words is just, well, dishonest. |
I don't have to. You know you're making a dishonest complaint because you've already noted the root of it, my typo that didn't work the quotation machinery. That's not adding to what you wrote.
See, anyone who can read will look at that and understand, as you did, what the error was and where your words are separate from mine.
To try to fashion that into adding or altering your words is just, well, dishonest.
Worse, she can't get out of her own way. First she makes a big deal over my failure on the close quote and then she pretends I'm adding words/altering what she clearly understands is nothing more than a faulty line of demarcation, a keystroke leading to a cosmetic error that still shouldn't confuse anyone who's actually reading the thing...whoever that poor soul might be.Mountains out of mole hills ?
Don't be obtuse.
She's thinking about the money. and the drugs and deviant rape sex
"You" insistence? See how easily that sort of thing happens? Anyway, nothing anyone says makes the truth. Rather, my argument and God's nature make the case, your blind eye and deaf ear nothwithstanding.
I don't confuse you with Christ or Paul. Likewise, your usage.Ah, and you think Jesus calling someone a fool, which He did....and as did Paul, means they were in danger of hell fire? You really should understand what Jesus meant when He spoke those words in Matthew before you toss them about like you do there.
That wasn't what I said and it isn't the joke, but thanks for making it funnier.
I'd hope so. Any Christian should. And no Christian should ever declare a brother in Christ as a Christ denier...bearing false witness, like calling that brother a fool, is dangerous business.
Being lectured on humility by you is like being lectured on fidelity by Judas.
"They" are? See what I mean? A really bad idea to make as a point if you're going to be this consistently sloppy. Else, no one has said that there aren't consequences for our actions or that some consequences wouldn't constitute just deserts. We're talking about a particular here, rape, and that's no more deserved by a stripper than her murder would be.
Rape isn't deserved. That our actions can have consequence doesn't justify or raise to virtue ever consequence that occurs as a result of them. A five year old boy finds his father's gun. He knows he isn't supposed to play with it. He does anyway and inadvertently blows his own head off. That's a consequence. Deserved? No. It's tragic and out of proportion, as punishments go, with the offense.
An ostrich isn't an elephant either, but the point wasn't found there.A five year old boy is not a stripper.
Right. The consequence of his actions is grossly disproportionate with the act. He isn't being punished.Of course he doesn't deserve to die.
I don't. Rather, no one, no one can deserve to be raped. It's not about knowing the stripper or even that she's a stripper.You run your same old movie claiming you know what a stripper does not deserve as if you were God,
Actually, after LoneStar literally set out your error on the heels of my suggesting you had it wrong you did what you had no choice to do, but even then your approach was, in essence, "Oh, I knew thought of that as I went to bed." But you didn't correct it until after the truth was inarguably set out. That's not really owning much, is it.Awesome timing. I see a lecture coming, so I'll offer you this as a bit of a rebuke for your hypocrisy. Just be matter of fact, tell it like it is, don't try so hard to impress or be puffed up. You look silly laughing while trying to cover up your mistake. Just admit it ....like I did about saying Jacob never saw Joseph again.
Are you chastising yourself or just underscoring that you don't love me? :think: I got that already.1 Cor. 13:4-7
Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; does not behave rudely, does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
I'm sure there's a real rush on.Lots of people claim to be my brother in Christ.
Now you're in full blown troll mode. I was wondering when you'd start to commit to the process that ends in, "Find Christ, town" or the like.I'm not gullible enough to believe them all. I'm more apt to see how their understanding of the word of God comports with what is written.
Yeah, your concern really comes through.Since believers are not under the law for righteousness, it most certainly is not dangerous to address someone as a fool. No matter their claim. When someone is being a fool, I'll be more than happy to tell them. It's really for their own good.
Oh so that's how you ultimately deal with the "fancy words" bit that bothers you. You call rationality suspect and consider your superior part a manifestation of spiritual understanding. That's not exactly what I think you're full of...but I won't question your faith, only how you use it.I hardly think I can trust your judgment. So far, you sound more like one who trusts in his natural human understanding instead of any spiritual understanding. Perhaps, you'll improve as you put off the pride you've been manifesting thus far.
So once you understand that you understand there are consequences in this world, good and bad, that are wildly disproportionate to the act and that laying that at God's feet would be mistaken. Then we move to Job's friends and the illustration that making that call is mostly above our pay grade.
Happens all the time, in this world or the next.
Of course. If you look for trouble you're going to find it. Doesn't move the point on rape.
Right, the righteous and the wicked suffer in this life, but the wicked will also suffer in the next, will suffer more.
I don't have scripture to back a thing I'm not doing? lain:
I'm sure there's a real rush on.
An ostrich isn't an elephant either, but the point wasn't found there.
Right. The consequence of his actions is grossly disproportionate with the act. He isn't being punished.
I don't. Rather, no one, no one can deserve to be raped. It's not about knowing the stripper or even that she's a stripper.
She's toxic. I hope all of you walk away from her poison, you'll be better off.
Honestly, if someone hated Christianity, they couldn't have done better than to set out sod and glorydaz as representatives.
Actually, after I LoneStar literally set out your error on the heels of my suggesting you had it wrong you did what you had no choice to do, but even then your approach was, in essence, "Oh, I knew thought of that as I went to bed." But you didn't correct it until after the truth was inarguably set out. That's not really owning much, is it.
Now you're in full blown troll mode. I was wondering when you'd start to commit to the process that ends in, "Find Christ, town" or the like.
That's not exactly what I think you're full of...but I won't question your faith, only how you use it.
On that note feel free to continue to bang your drum. I've seen enough of your circus. So go to. And if you want a confession it's this: they were right about you and I was wrong. I've rarely been as sorry to admit it and publicly, but there it is. God help you.
When a woman is raped then no she does not like it. This might come as a shock to you but women don't enjoy being raped.
you'd think they'd try to avoid being put in a position where it might be more likely then, wouldn't you?
Women don't have to put themselves in a position where it might be more likely to be raped.
Hypocrite....you won't question my faith. :chuckle:
Yeah, I saw LoneStar's post first. It was in the "view last post" slot. I know you'd like to think you told me so first, but you didn't. I responded to him with the TRUTH. I had thought about it and that's when I realized Jacob had to spend his entire life mourning for what he thought was a dead son. Your "no evil came from it" comment made me ill. Then I read the rest of your garbage and it was filled with gloating over your "fancy words" and your whining over being called a humanist.
I already told Res he was right about you all along. Your righteous indignation is noted. Of course after scolding me about Joseph seeing his father again before he died, I notice you forgot the little fact that you claimed NO EVIL CAME FROM what the brothers did. Not one peep from you on that one. You're simply a joke, Town. And it's good to know. :wave:
The consequence of his actions is grossly disproportionate with the act.